Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert to haproxy22 #97

Merged

Conversation

frobware
Copy link
Contributor

@frobware frobware commented Jul 7, 2021

This partially reverts PR #95.

We are switching back to haproxy-2.2 as our performance analysis shows
there are performance degradations when compared to the haproxy-2.2
series.

We are switching back to haproxy-2.2 as our performance analysis shows
there are performance degradations when compared to the haproxy-2.2
series.
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from knobunc and sgreene570 July 7, 2021 16:02
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 7, 2021
@Miciah
Copy link
Contributor

Miciah commented Jul 8, 2021

/lgtm

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 8, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: frobware, Miciah

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 8, 2021
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 4202141 into openshift:master Jul 8, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants