Bug 1886462: Add the namespace to the gatherers reports to avoid conflicts

[rluders]

Fix collisions between pdbs with the same name but living in different namespaces.

[openshift-ci-robot]

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

[openshift-ci-robot]

@rluders: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1886462, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug

• bug is open, matching expected state (open)
• bug target release (4.7.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.7.0)
• bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to this:

Bug 1886462: Add the namespace to pdbs reports filename.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[tisnik]

It looks ok!

[rluders]

I went one step further in this one, 'cause I noticed that the same issue could be happening with other gatherers. So, I guess that know, it assure that whenever we have a namespace, the report should be stored under the namespace's folder.

It would need some changes in the tests, and also, probably we want to want to release notes for our users. 'Cause this change is a potential breaker.

[martinkunc]

Thanks @rluders, nice work. It looks only PDBs and MachineSets are NS scoped. Maybe we could add investigation of this add to our "adding new data" document..

[martinkunc]

/lgtm

[0sewa0]

Tested it locally, works as expected :)

/lgtm

[openshift-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: 0sewa0, martinkunc, rluders, tisnik

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [0sewa0,martinkunc,rluders,tisnik]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[openshift-bot]

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@rluders: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

• openshift/insights-operator#209

Bugzilla bug 1886462 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1886462: Add the namespace to the gatherers reports to avoid conflicts

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.