[release-4.6] Bug 1894244: Fixes records index on diskrecorder

[rluders]

This is a backport of #246

CCXDEV-3429

[openshift-ci-robot]

@rluders: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1894244, which is invalid:

• expected the bug to target the "4.6.z" release, but it targets "---" instead
• expected Bugzilla bug 1894244 to depend on a bug targeting a release in 4.7.0 and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

[release-4.6] Bug 1894244: Fixes records index on diskrecorder

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@rluders: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1894244, which is invalid:

• expected the bug to target the "4.6.z" release, but it targets "---" instead
• expected Bugzilla bug 1894244 to depend on a bug targeting a release in 4.7.0 and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

[release-4.6] Bug 1894244: Fixes records index on diskrecorder

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

[rluders]

/bugzilla refresh

[openshift-ci-robot]

@rluders: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1894244, which is invalid:

• expected Bugzilla bug 1894244 to depend on a bug targeting a release in 4.7.0 and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[rluders]

/bugzilla refresh

[openshift-ci-robot]

@rluders: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1894244, which is invalid:

• expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1893766 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[rluders]

/bugzilla refresh

[openshift-ci-robot]

@rluders: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1894244, which is invalid:

• expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1893766 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[rluders]

/bugzilla refresh

[openshift-ci-robot]

@rluders: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1894244, which is invalid:

• expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1893766 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is CLOSED (WONTFIX) instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[rluders]

/bugzilla refresh

[openshift-ci-robot]

@rluders: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1894244, which is invalid:

• expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1893766 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is CLOSED (WORKSFORME) instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[rluders]

/bugzilla refresh

[openshift-ci-robot]

@rluders: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1894244, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug

• bug is open, matching expected state (open)
• bug target release (4.6.z) matches configured target release for branch (4.6.z)
• bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
• dependent bug Bugzilla bug 1893766 is in the state CLOSED (ERRATA), which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA))
• dependent Bugzilla bug 1893766 targets the "4.7.0" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.7.0
• bug has dependents

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[tremes]

/lgtm

[openshift-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: rluders, tremes

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [rluders,tremes]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[markmc]

(patch manager) @rluders I tried hard, but I can't tell from the PR, commit message, bz, or JIRA just what the impact of not having this fix is, nor the risk that the backport will result in other issues

[rluders]

@markmc basically it is a bug fix. It fixes a problem related to the report collection, where it wasn't considering the resource naming space and was overwriting some reports on the index of reports array. In this case, it wasn't only ignoring the fully report collection, as it wasn't cleaning up it from memory. This PR fixes both issues.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@rluders: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

• openshift/insights-operator#261

Bugzilla bug 1894244 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

[release-4.6] Bug 1894244: Fixes records index on diskrecorder

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.