Bug 1899161: openstack: consider volumes for storage requirements checks #4508

EmilienM · 2020-12-22T20:03:12Z

It is possible to boot a server without using ephemeral storage, with
boot from volume:
https://docs.openstack.org/cinder/latest/admin/blockstorage-boot-from-volume.html

This patch will disable flavor storage check if rootVolume is used in
the Machine Pool and checks that the volume is at least 25Gb sized.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1899161

Signed-off-by: Emilien Macchi emilien@redhat.com
(cherry picked from commit 1b400b4)

It is possible to boot a server without using ephemeral storage, with boot from volume: https://docs.openstack.org/cinder/latest/admin/blockstorage-boot-from-volume.html This patch will disable flavor storage check if rootVolume is used in the Machine Pool and checks that the volume is at least 25Gb sized. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1891543 Signed-off-by: Emilien Macchi <emilien@redhat.com> (cherry picked from commit 1b400b4)

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-12-22T20:03:13Z

@EmilienM: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

openstack: consider volumes for storage requirements checks

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-12-22T20:03:33Z

@EmilienM: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1899161, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1894678 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead
expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1894678 to target a release in 4.7.0, but it targets "4.6.z" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 1899161: openstack: consider volumes for storage requirements checks

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-12-22T20:03:37Z

@EmilienM: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1899161, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1894678 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead
expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1894678 to target a release in 4.7.0, but it targets "4.6.z" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 1899161: openstack: consider volumes for storage requirements checks

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

EmilienM · 2020-12-22T20:03:58Z

/label platform/openstack

EmilienM · 2020-12-22T20:04:54Z

/bugzilla refresh

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-12-22T20:04:58Z

@EmilienM: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1899161, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1894678 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead
expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1894678 to target a release in 4.7.0, but it targets "4.6.z" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

pierreprinetti · 2020-12-22T20:33:22Z

/bugzilla refresh

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-12-22T20:33:27Z

@pierreprinetti: An error was encountered adding this pull request to the external tracker bugs for bug 1899161 on the Bugzilla server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com:

JSONRPC error 32000: There was an error reported for the RPC call to Jira: There was an error reported for a GitHub REST call. URL: https://api.github.com/repos/openshift/installer/pulls/4508 Error: 403 Forbidden at /loader/0x556e25edb2f8/Bugzilla/Extension/ExternalBugs/Type/GitHub.pm line 111. at /loader/0x556e25edb2f8/Bugzilla/Extension/ExternalBugs/Type/GitHub.pm line 111. eval {...} called at /loader/0x556e25edb2f8/Bugzilla/Extension/ExternalBugs/Type/GitHub.pm line 98 Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::Type::GitHub::_do_rest_call('Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::Type::GitHub=HASH(0x556e29...', 'https://api.github.com/repos/openshift/installer/pulls/4508', 'GET') called at /loader/0x556e25edb2f8/Bugzilla/Extension/ExternalBugs/Type/GitHub.pm line 62 Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::Type::GitHub::get_data('Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::Type::GitHub=HASH(0x556e29...', 'Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::Bug=HASH(0x556e2932faf0)') called at /loader/0x556e25edb2f8/Bugzilla/Extension/ExternalBugs/Bug.pm line 302 eval {...} called at /loader/0x556e25edb2f8/Bugzilla/Extension/ExternalBugs/Bug.pm line 302 Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::Bug::update_ext_info('Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::Bug=HASH(0x556e2932faf0)', 1) called at /loader/0x556e25edb2f8/Bugzilla/Extension/ExternalBugs/Bug.pm line 125 Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::Bug::create('Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::Bug', 'HASH(0x556e29cbf5f0)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/extensions/ExternalBugs/Extension.pm line 940 Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::bug_start_of_update('Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs=HASH(0x556e29b70ed0)', 'HASH(0x556e292f1938)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/Hook.pm line 21 Bugzilla::Hook::process('bug_start_of_update', 'HASH(0x556e292f1938)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/Bug.pm line 1173 Bugzilla::Bug::update('Bugzilla::Bug=HASH(0x556e29342c08)') called at /loader/0x556e25edb2f8/Bugzilla/Extension/ExternalBugs/WebService.pm line 88 Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::WebService::add_external_bug('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::Bugzilla::Extension::E...', 'HASH(0x556e29b51fb8)') called at (eval 2041) line 1 eval ' $procedure->{code}->($self, @params) ;' called at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/JSON/RPC/Legacy/Server.pm line 220 JSON::RPC::Legacy::Server::_handle('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::Bugzilla::Extension::E...', 'HASH(0x556e293120a8)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/WebService/Server/JSONRPC.pm line 297 Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::_handle('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::Bugzilla::Extension::E...', 'HASH(0x556e293120a8)') called at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/JSON/RPC/Legacy/Server.pm line 126 JSON::RPC::Legacy::Server::handle('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::Bugzilla::Extension::E...') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/WebService/Server/JSONRPC.pm line 70 Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::handle('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::Bugzilla::Extension::E...') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/jsonrpc.cgi line 31 ModPerl::ROOT::Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler::var_www_html_bugzilla_jsonrpc_2ecgi::handler('Apache2::RequestRec=SCALAR(0x556e298c98e0)') called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/RegistryCooker.pm line 207 eval {...} called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/RegistryCooker.pm line 207 ModPerl::RegistryCooker::run('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler=HASH(0x556e29b5eda8)') called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/RegistryCooker.pm line 173 ModPerl::RegistryCooker::default_handler('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler=HASH(0x556e29b5eda8)') called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/Registry.pm line 32 ModPerl::Registry::handler('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler', 'Apache2::RequestRec=SCALAR(0x556e298c98e0)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/mod_perl.pl line 139 Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler::handler('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler', 'Apache2::RequestRec=SCALAR(0x556e298c98e0)') called at (eval 2041) line 0 eval {...} called at (eval 2041) line 0 at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/Error.pm line 130. Bugzilla::Error::_throw_error('global/user-error.html.tmpl', 'ext_bz_rest_error', 'HASH(0x556e298e01e8)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/Error.pm line 193 Bugzilla::Error::ThrowUserError('ext_bz_rest_error', 'HASH(0x556e298e01e8)') called at /loader/0x556e25edb2f8/Bugzilla/Extension/ExternalBugs/Type/GitHub.pm line 120 Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::Type::GitHub::_do_rest_call('Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::Type::GitHub=HASH(0x556e29...', 'https://api.github.com/repos/openshift/installer/pulls/4508', 'GET') called at /loader/0x556e25edb2f8/Bugzilla/Extension/ExternalBugs/Type/GitHub.pm line 62 Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::Type::GitHub::get_data('Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::Type::GitHub=HASH(0x556e29...', 'Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::Bug=HASH(0x556e2932faf0)') called at /loader/0x556e25edb2f8/Bugzilla/Extension/ExternalBugs/Bug.pm line 302 eval {...} called at /loader/0x556e25edb2f8/Bugzilla/Extension/ExternalBugs/Bug.pm line 302 Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::Bug::update_ext_info('Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::Bug=HASH(0x556e2932faf0)', 1) called at /loader/0x556e25edb2f8/Bugzilla/Extension/ExternalBugs/Bug.pm line 125 Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::Bug::create('Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::Bug', 'HASH(0x556e29cbf5f0)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/extensions/ExternalBugs/Extension.pm line 940 Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::bug_start_of_update('Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs=HASH(0x556e29b70ed0)', 'HASH(0x556e292f1938)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/Hook.pm line 21 Bugzilla::Hook::process('bug_start_of_update', 'HASH(0x556e292f1938)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/Bug.pm line 1173 Bugzilla::Bug::update('Bugzilla::Bug=HASH(0x556e29342c08)') called at /loader/0x556e25edb2f8/Bugzilla/Extension/ExternalBugs/WebService.pm line 88 Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::WebService::add_external_bug('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::Bugzilla::Extension::E...', 'HASH(0x556e29b51fb8)') called at (eval 2041) line 1 eval ' $procedure->{code}->($self, @params) ;' called at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/JSON/RPC/Legacy/Server.pm line 220 JSON::RPC::Legacy::Server::_handle('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::Bugzilla::Extension::E...', 'HASH(0x556e293120a8)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/WebService/Server/JSONRPC.pm line 297 Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::_handle('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::Bugzilla::Extension::E...', 'HASH(0x556e293120a8)') called at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/JSON/RPC/Legacy/Server.pm line 126 JSON::RPC::Legacy::Server::handle('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::Bugzilla::Extension::E...') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/WebService/Server/JSONRPC.pm line 70 Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::handle('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::Bugzilla::Extension::E...') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/jsonrpc.cgi line 31 ModPerl::ROOT::Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler::var_www_html_bugzilla_jsonrpc_2ecgi::handler('Apache2::RequestRec=SCALAR(0x556e298c98e0)') called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/RegistryCooker.pm line 207 eval {...} called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/RegistryCooker.pm line 207 ModPerl::RegistryCooker::run('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler=HASH(0x556e29b5eda8)') called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/RegistryCooker.pm line 173 ModPerl::RegistryCooker::default_handler('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler=HASH(0x556e29b5eda8)') called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/Registry.pm line 32 ModPerl::Registry::handler('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler', 'Apache2::RequestRec=SCALAR(0x556e298c98e0)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/mod_perl.pl line 139 Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler::handler('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler', 'Apache2::RequestRec=SCALAR(0x556e298c98e0)') called at (eval 2041) line 0 eval {...} called at (eval 2041) line 0
Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

pierreprinetti · 2020-12-22T20:46:39Z

/bugzilla refresh

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-12-22T20:46:45Z

@pierreprinetti: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1899161, which is valid. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug

bug is open, matching expected state (open)
bug target release (4.6.z) matches configured target release for branch (4.6.z)
bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
dependent bug Bugzilla bug 1891543 is in the state VERIFIED, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA))
dependent Bugzilla bug 1891543 targets the "4.7.0" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.7.0
bug has dependents

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

EmilienM · 2020-12-23T01:33:18Z

/retest

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-12-23T08:47:21Z

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: pierreprinetti

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

~~docs/user/openstack/OWNERS~~ [pierreprinetti]
~~pkg/asset/installconfig/openstack/OWNERS~~ [pierreprinetti]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

pierreprinetti · 2020-12-23T08:47:52Z

/lgtm

openshift-bot · 2020-12-23T10:31:50Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2020-12-23T10:44:50Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-01-10T20:40:12Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-01-10T20:53:18Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-01-10T21:06:15Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-01-10T21:19:14Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-01-10T21:32:12Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-01-10T21:45:19Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-01-11T02:18:14Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-01-11T02:44:13Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-01-11T02:57:13Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-01-11T03:10:14Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-01-11T03:23:13Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-01-11T03:36:12Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-01-11T03:49:14Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-01-11T04:02:12Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-01-11T04:15:13Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-01-11T04:28:12Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-01-11T05:59:12Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-01-11T07:04:24Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

pierreprinetti · 2021-01-15T09:49:15Z

/bugzilla refresh

openshift-ci-robot · 2021-01-15T09:49:20Z

@pierreprinetti: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1899161, which is valid.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug

bug is open, matching expected state (open)
bug target release (4.6.z) matches configured target release for branch (4.6.z)
bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
dependent bug Bugzilla bug 1891543 is in the state VERIFIED, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA))
dependent Bugzilla bug 1891543 targets the "4.7.0" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.7.0
bug has dependents

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

ashcrow · 2021-01-15T15:46:44Z

#4323

openshift-bot · 2021-01-15T18:01:27Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-01-15T18:40:27Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-01-15T19:32:28Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-01-15T21:55:29Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-01-15T22:47:24Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-ci-robot · 2021-01-15T23:33:12Z

@EmilienM: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 1899161 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1899161: openstack: consider volumes for storage requirements checks

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

EmilienM changed the title ~~openstack: consider volumes for storage requirements checks~~ Bug 1899161: openstack: consider volumes for storage requirements checks Dec 22, 2020

openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/severity-urgent Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is urgent for the branch this PR is targeting. label Dec 22, 2020

openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Dec 22, 2020

openshift-ci-robot requested review from mandre and pierreprinetti December 22, 2020 20:03

openshift-ci-robot added the platform/openstack label Dec 22, 2020

openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Dec 22, 2020

openshift-ci-robot removed the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Dec 22, 2020

pierreprinetti approved these changes Dec 23, 2020

View reviewed changes

openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 23, 2020

openshift-ci-robot assigned pierreprinetti Dec 23, 2020

openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 23, 2020

russellb added cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. and removed cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. labels Jan 6, 2021

ashcrow added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Jan 15, 2021

openshift-merge-robot merged commit a8eaa59 into openshift:release-4.6 Jan 15, 2021

pierreprinetti deleted the bz/1899161 branch January 18, 2021 10:45

Bug 1899161: openstack: consider volumes for storage requirements checks #4508

Bug 1899161: openstack: consider volumes for storage requirements checks #4508

Conversation

EmilienM commented Dec 22, 2020 • edited

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 22, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 22, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 22, 2020

EmilienM commented Dec 22, 2020

EmilienM commented Dec 22, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 22, 2020

pierreprinetti commented Dec 22, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 22, 2020

pierreprinetti commented Dec 22, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 22, 2020

EmilienM commented Dec 23, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 23, 2020

pierreprinetti commented Dec 23, 2020

openshift-bot commented Dec 23, 2020

openshift-bot commented Dec 23, 2020

openshift-bot commented Jan 10, 2021

openshift-bot commented Jan 10, 2021

openshift-bot commented Jan 10, 2021

openshift-bot commented Jan 10, 2021

openshift-bot commented Jan 10, 2021

openshift-bot commented Jan 10, 2021

openshift-bot commented Jan 11, 2021

openshift-bot commented Jan 11, 2021

openshift-bot commented Jan 11, 2021

openshift-bot commented Jan 11, 2021

openshift-bot commented Jan 11, 2021

openshift-bot commented Jan 11, 2021

openshift-bot commented Jan 11, 2021

openshift-bot commented Jan 11, 2021

openshift-bot commented Jan 11, 2021

openshift-bot commented Jan 11, 2021

openshift-bot commented Jan 11, 2021

openshift-bot commented Jan 11, 2021

pierreprinetti commented Jan 15, 2021

openshift-ci-robot commented Jan 15, 2021

ashcrow commented Jan 15, 2021

openshift-bot commented Jan 15, 2021

openshift-bot commented Jan 15, 2021

openshift-bot commented Jan 15, 2021

openshift-bot commented Jan 15, 2021

openshift-bot commented Jan 15, 2021

openshift-ci-robot commented Jan 15, 2021

EmilienM commented Dec 22, 2020 •

edited