Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release-4.7] Bug 1948398: remove ovirt_cafile from ovirt-credentials secret #4842

Conversation

openshift-cherrypick-robot

This is an automated cherry-pick of #4809

/assign Gal-Zaidman

When the user tried to use an ovirt.config with a ca_file the ca_file path is written to the secret but this will not be the path of the file in the created machines which will cause connection errors in the machine object that tries to find the file that doesn't exist.
Instead we should read the file content and write it as the ovirt_ca_bundle in case the ovirt_ca_bundle is not set on the ovirt.config file.
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Bugzilla bug 1945659 has been cloned as Bugzilla bug 1948398. Retitling PR to link against new bug.
/retitle [release-4.7] Bug 1948398: remove ovirt_cafile from ovirt-credentials secret

In response to this:

[release-4.7] Bug 1945659: remove ovirt_cafile from ovirt-credentials secret

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot requested review from a user and jhixson74 April 12, 2021 06:51
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot changed the title [release-4.7] Bug 1945659: remove ovirt_cafile from ovirt-credentials secret [release-4.7] Bug 1948398: remove ovirt_cafile from ovirt-credentials secret Apr 12, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Apr 12, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1948398, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1945659 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

[release-4.7] Bug 1948398: remove ovirt_cafile from ovirt-credentials secret

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@Gal-Zaidman
Copy link
Contributor

/hold

This PR needs openshift/cloud-credential-operator#322

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 12, 2021
@staebler
Copy link
Contributor

/approve

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: staebler

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 12, 2021
@Gal-Zaidman
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

@Gal-Zaidman
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 19, 2021

@Gal-Zaidman: An error was encountered querying GitHub for users with public email (gdeolive@redhat.com) for bug 1948398 on the Bugzilla server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com. No known errors were detected, please see the full error message for details.

Full error message. non-200 OK status code: 403 Forbidden body: "{\n \"documentation_url\": \"https://docs.github.com/en/free-pro-team@latest/rest/overview/resources-in-the-rest-api#abuse-rate-limits\",\n \"message\": \"You have triggered an abuse detection mechanism. Please wait a few minutes before you try again.\"\n}\n"

Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@Gal-Zaidman
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels May 19, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 19, 2021

@Gal-Zaidman: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1948398, which is valid.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.7.z) matches configured target release for branch (4.7.z)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
  • dependent bug Bugzilla bug 1945659 is in the state VERIFIED, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE))
  • dependent Bugzilla bug 1945659 targets the "4.8.0" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.8.0
  • bug has dependents

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Bugzilla (gdeolive@redhat.com), skipping review request.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@Gal-Zaidman
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

1 similar comment
@Gal-Zaidman
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

@Gal-Zaidman
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 20, 2021
@sdodson sdodson added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label May 21, 2021
@sdodson
Copy link
Member

sdodson commented May 22, 2021

@Gal-Zaidman please remove the hold if this is ready, I'll need to remove cheery-pick-approved by Monday if this hasn't merged.

@Gal-Zaidman
Copy link
Contributor

/unhold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label May 23, 2021
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

18 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 24, 2021

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-crc 08c67f7 link /test e2e-crc

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@sdodson
Copy link
Member

sdodson commented May 24, 2021

/override ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 24, 2021

@sdodson: Overrode contexts on behalf of sdodson: ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit fa645ee into openshift:release-4.7 May 24, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 24, 2021

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 1948398 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

[release-4.7] Bug 1948398: remove ovirt_cafile from ovirt-credentials secret

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@Gal-Zaidman
Copy link
Contributor

/cherry-pick release-4.6

@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Author

@Gal-Zaidman: new pull request created: #4955

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.6

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants