New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bug 2066406: OpenStack+Kuryr: Fix cluster destroy
with BYON
#5754
Bug 2066406: OpenStack+Kuryr: Fix cluster destroy
with BYON
#5754
Conversation
During a FIP less installation VMs that were not created by the installer can get a FIP detached when the cluster in being destroyed. This commit fixes the issue by detaching only FIPs that were created by installer or Kuryr during a FIP less installation.
When using your own Network for the Machines connected to a tagged Router created by CNO on an installation with Kuryr, the Subnet of that Network is not tagged and consequently not identified by installer when destroying the Router. This commit fixes the issue by ensuring all Subnetes connected to a Router created by Installer or CNO are removed.
@dulek: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2066406, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/bugzilla refresh |
@dulek: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2066406, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. 6 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/test e2e-openstack |
/test e2e-openstack-kuryr |
@pierreprinetti, @MaysaMacedo, @mandre: OpenStack jobs are happy, this is ready for reviews. It's just combining two backports. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Interesting that we had #4616 already in 4.8, but didn't bother to get all the fixes in. One more case for more proactive backports.
/lgtm
/approve
/label backport-risk-assessed |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: mandre The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/retest-required |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
1 similar comment
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
@dulek: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
2 similar comments
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
2 similar comments
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/skip |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/label cherry-pick-approved |
@dulek: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Bugzilla bug 2066406 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/cherry-pick release-4.6 |
@dulek: #5754 failed to apply on top of branch "release-4.6":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
This includes two backports that are required for
cluster destroy
with bring your own network mode to work. One backport comes from this BZ [1] and is related to FIPs and second one [2] makes sure all subnets are removed from the created router, not only tagged ones.[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1924701
[2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1940159