Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix the deployment on OpenStack for worker pools with no replicas. #7356

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Jul 23, 2023

Conversation

mandre
Copy link
Member

@mandre mandre commented Jul 21, 2023

Commit a1ea1c8 changed how the
machinesets get generated. We no longer generate machineset when the
number of replicas is 0, meaning we need to provide a default value for
openstack_worker_server_group_names so that terraform does not blow
up.

Also document the rootVolume.type config as deprecated. We now need to use rootVolume.types.

Commit a1ea1c8 changed how the
machinesets get generated. We no longer generate machineset when the
number of replicas is 0, meaning we need to provide a default value for
`openstack_worker_server_group_names` so that terraform does not blow
up.
@EmilienM
Copy link
Member

/retest-required

The CI errors look unrelated

/lgtm
/approve

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 21, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 21, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: EmilienM

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 21, 2023
@r4f4
Copy link
Contributor

r4f4 commented Jul 21, 2023

/override ci/prow/unit
The unit test failure is a known issue and not related to this PR.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 21, 2023

@r4f4: Overrode contexts on behalf of r4f4: ci/prow/unit

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/unit
The unit test failure is a known issue and not related to this PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 2c44943 and 2 for PR HEAD ff13ec5 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 4d777eb and 1 for PR HEAD ff13ec5 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 6202d33 and 0 for PR HEAD ff13ec5 in total

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 22, 2023

@mandre: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-openstack-sdn-parallel ff13ec5 link false /test e2e-openstack-sdn-parallel

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/hold

Revision ff13ec5 was retested 3 times: holding

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 22, 2023
@EmilienM
Copy link
Member

/hold cancel
/retest-required

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 23, 2023
@pierreprinetti
Copy link
Member

Can we please have a test for the zero-workers case?

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit a8fe4d0 into openshift:master Jul 23, 2023
24 of 25 checks passed
@mandre mandre deleted the clarify-type branch July 24, 2023 00:25
@mandre
Copy link
Member Author

mandre commented Jul 24, 2023

Can we please have a test for the zero-workers case?

I'm adding the e2e-openstack-nfv-intel job as a pre-submit for the installer with openshift/release#41564.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants