Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release-4.12] OCPBUGS-30630: baremetal: populate customDeploy in advance #8144

Conversation

openshift-cherrypick-robot

This is an automated cherry-pick of #8129

/assign honza

Currently, we do not populate any deployment fields when creating
BareMetalHosts, relying on the Machine API to do it instead.
However, not setting customDeploy makes the BMH controller think that
we're doing an image-based deployment and configure its resources
accordingly. If MAPI is slow enough, the hosts become provisioned
before customDeploy is set, and the controller enters a loop trying and
failing to switch away from the image-based deployment.

TL;DR just set customDeploy on creation.
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Detected clone of Jira Issue OCPBUGS-30629 with correct target version. Will retitle the PR to link to the clone.
/retitle [release-4.12] OCPBUGS-30630: baremetal: populate customDeploy in advance

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #8129

/assign honza

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title [release-4.12] OCPBUGS-30629: baremetal: populate customDeploy in advance [release-4.12] OCPBUGS-30630: baremetal: populate customDeploy in advance Mar 12, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/severity-moderate Referenced Jira bug's severity is moderate for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Mar 12, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-30630, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-30629 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but it is MODIFIED instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #8129

/assign honza

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from elfosardo and sadasu March 12, 2024 19:16
@sadasu
Copy link
Contributor

sadasu commented Apr 11, 2024

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@sadasu: An error was encountered searching for bug OCPBUGS-30630 on the Jira server at https://issues.redhat.com/. No known errors were detected, please see the full error message for details.

Full error message. No response returned: Get "https://issues.redhat.com/rest/api/2/issue/OCPBUGS-30630": GET https://issues.redhat.com/rest/api/2/issue/OCPBUGS-30630 giving up after 5 attempt(s)

Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with /jira refresh.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@sadasu
Copy link
Contributor

sadasu commented Apr 11, 2024

/approve

@sadasu
Copy link
Contributor

sadasu commented Apr 11, 2024

/label backport-risk-assessed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label Apr 11, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 11, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sadasu

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 11, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 11, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sadasu

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@jadhaj
Copy link

jadhaj commented Apr 24, 2024

/label cherry-pick-approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Apr 24, 2024
@honza
Copy link
Member

honza commented Apr 24, 2024

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@honza: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-30630, which is invalid:

  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required"

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@honza
Copy link
Member

honza commented Apr 24, 2024

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Apr 24, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@honza: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-30630, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.12.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.12.z)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note text is set and does not match the template
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-30629 is in the state Closed (Done-Errata), which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-30629 targets the "4.13.z" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.13.0, 4.13.z
  • bug has dependents

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (jhajyahy@redhat.com), skipping review request.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@dtantsur
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 24, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 24, 2024

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-disruptive 9548bb1 link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-disruptive
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-virtualmedia 9548bb1 link false /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-virtualmedia

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 4abd5e3 and 2 for PR HEAD 9548bb1 in total

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 596554b into openshift:release-4.12 Apr 24, 2024
28 of 30 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-30630: Some pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

The following pull requests linked via external trackers have not merged:

These pull request must merge or be unlinked from the Jira bug in order for it to move to the next state. Once unlinked, request a bug refresh with /jira refresh.

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-30630 has not been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #8129

/assign honza

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

This PR has been included in build ose-installer-container-v4.12.0-202404241637.p0.g596554b.assembly.stream.el8 for distgit ose-installer.
All builds following this will include this PR.

@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Fix included in accepted release 4.12.0-0.nightly-2024-04-26-114645

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. jira/severity-moderate Referenced Jira bug's severity is moderate for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

8 participants