Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OCPBUGS-33661: capi/aws: rename preserveBootstrapIgnition #8460

Merged

Conversation

r4f4
Copy link
Contributor

@r4f4 r4f4 commented May 23, 2024

The name doesn't really reflect the purpose of the field, but the terraform implementation instead. Since the implementation has changed in capi/capa, let's rename it so users don't expect the ignition object to not be destroyed when there are enough permissions.

The old field is kept for the deprecation period but will be removed in the future in favor of the new BestEffortDeleteIgnition.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label May 23, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@r4f4: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-33661, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.17.0" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

The name doesn't really reflect the purpose of the field, but the terraform implementation instead. Since the implementation has changed in capi/capa, let's rename it so users don't expect the ignition object to not be destroyed when there are enough permissions.

The old field is kept for the deprecation period but will be removed in the future in favor of the new BestEffortDeleteIgnition.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label May 23, 2024
@r4f4
Copy link
Contributor Author

r4f4 commented May 23, 2024

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label May 23, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@r4f4: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-33661, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.17.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.17.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (yunjiang@redhat.com), skipping review request.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label May 23, 2024
@r4f4
Copy link
Contributor Author

r4f4 commented May 23, 2024

If #8410 gets merged first, then this PR should be updated to use the new field name in the check introduced by 8410.

@r4f4 r4f4 force-pushed the capi-aws-preserve-ignition-rename branch from 15619b3 to 6e22c63 Compare May 23, 2024 18:16
@r4f4
Copy link
Contributor Author

r4f4 commented May 23, 2024

Update: fixed the printer unit tests.

@r4f4
Copy link
Contributor Author

r4f4 commented May 23, 2024

/test e2e-aws-ovn

Copy link
Contributor

@barbacbd barbacbd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 24, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: barbacbd

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 24, 2024
@r4f4
Copy link
Contributor Author

r4f4 commented May 24, 2024

/cherry-pick release-4.16

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@r4f4: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-4.16 in a new PR and assign it to you.

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.16

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@r4f4
Copy link
Contributor Author

r4f4 commented May 24, 2024

/override ci/prow/okd-images
/test e2e-aws-ovn

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 24, 2024

@r4f4: Overrode contexts on behalf of r4f4: ci/prow/okd-images

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/okd-images
/test e2e-aws-ovn

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@patrickdillon
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 6, 2024
@r4f4
Copy link
Contributor Author

r4f4 commented Jun 6, 2024

/hold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 6, 2024
The name doesn't really reflect the purpose of the field, but the
terraform implementation instead. Since the implementation has changed
in capi/capa, let's rename it so users don't expect the ignition object
to not be destroyed when there are enough permissions.

The old field is kept for the deprecation period but will be removed in
the future in favor of the new `BestEffortDeleteIgnition`.
@r4f4 r4f4 force-pushed the capi-aws-preserve-ignition-rename branch from 6e22c63 to f5cfcd4 Compare June 7, 2024 08:54
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 7, 2024
@r4f4
Copy link
Contributor Author

r4f4 commented Jun 7, 2024

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 7, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 7, 2024

@r4f4: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-shared-vpc 6e22c63 link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-shared-vpc
ci/prow/okd-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade 6e22c63 link false /test okd-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade
ci/prow/e2e-aws-custom-security-groups 6e22c63 link false /test e2e-aws-custom-security-groups
ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi 6e22c63 link true /test e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-fips f5cfcd4 link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-fips

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@sadasu
Copy link
Contributor

sadasu commented Jun 11, 2024

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 11, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 7026956 and 2 for PR HEAD f5cfcd4 in total

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 9f02731 into openshift:master Jun 11, 2024
25 of 26 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@r4f4: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-33661: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-33661 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

The name doesn't really reflect the purpose of the field, but the terraform implementation instead. Since the implementation has changed in capi/capa, let's rename it so users don't expect the ignition object to not be destroyed when there are enough permissions.

The old field is kept for the deprecation period but will be removed in the future in favor of the new BestEffortDeleteIgnition.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@r4f4: new pull request created: #8574

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.16

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

This PR has been included in build ose-installer-altinfra-container-v4.17.0-202406120214.p0.g9f02731.assembly.stream.el9 for distgit ose-installer-altinfra.
All builds following this will include this PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants