Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1804128: Ramdisk arch should not be hardcoded #28

Merged

Conversation

elfosardo
Copy link

The arch of the ramdisk should be determined based on the system we're running on, not hardcoded.
This will fix the issue with the latest failing 4.4 builds.

Hardcoding is bad, don't do it kids.
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Feb 18, 2020
@hardys
Copy link

hardys commented Feb 18, 2020

lgtm pending bz and images CI!

@derekhiggins
Copy link

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 18, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: derekhiggins, elfosardo

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [derekhiggins,elfosardo]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@elfosardo elfosardo changed the title Ramdisk arch should not be hardcoded Bug 1804128: Ramdisk arch should not be hardcoded Feb 18, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@elfosardo: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1804128, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

Bug 1804128: Ramdisk arch should not be hardcoded

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Feb 18, 2020
@elfosardo
Copy link
Author

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@elfosardo: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1804128, which is valid.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit b017e58 into openshift:master Feb 18, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@elfosardo: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged. Bugzilla bug 1804128 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1804128: Ramdisk arch should not be hardcoded

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@elfosardo elfosardo deleted the no-freaking-hardcode-arch branch February 18, 2020 12:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants