Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release 4.5] Bug 1929120: update kubernetes-client-api #1232

Merged

Conversation

waveywaves
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/severity-urgent Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is urgent for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Feb 16, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@waveywaves: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1929120, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1928658 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead
  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1929118 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is NEW instead
  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1928658 to target a release in 4.6.0, 4.6.z, but it targets "4.8.0" instead
  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1929118 to target a release in 4.6.0, 4.6.z, but it targets "4.7.0" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

[release 4.5] Bug 1929120: update kubernetes-client-api

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 16, 2021
@waveywaves
Copy link
Contributor Author

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@waveywaves: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1929120, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1929121 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is NEW instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@jkhelil
Copy link
Contributor

jkhelil commented Feb 16, 2021

please update openshift-sync plugin to 1.0.46

@waveywaves
Copy link
Contributor Author

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@waveywaves: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1929120, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1929121 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is NEW instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@waveywaves
Copy link
Contributor Author

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@waveywaves: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1929120, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1929121 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is NEW instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@jkhelil
Copy link
Contributor

jkhelil commented Mar 17, 2021

/test e2e-aws-jenkins

@waveywaves
Copy link
Contributor Author

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@waveywaves: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1929120, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1929121 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is NEW instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@waveywaves
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@waveywaves
Copy link
Contributor Author

/bugilla refresh

@waveywaves
Copy link
Contributor Author

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@waveywaves: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1929120, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1929121 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@jkhelil
Copy link
Contributor

jkhelil commented Apr 8, 2021

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 8, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jkhelil, waveywaves

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1929120, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1929121 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@waveywaves
Copy link
Contributor Author

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@waveywaves: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1929120, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1929121 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1929120, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1929121 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1929120, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1929121 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1929120, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1929121 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@waveywaves
Copy link
Contributor Author

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@waveywaves: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1929120, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1929121 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@jkhelil
Copy link
Contributor

jkhelil commented Apr 12, 2021

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Apr 12, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@jkhelil: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1929120, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.5.z) matches configured target release for branch (4.5.z)
  • bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
  • dependent bug Bugzilla bug 1929121 is in the state VERIFIED, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE))
  • dependent Bugzilla bug 1929121 targets the "4.6.z" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.6.0, 4.6.z
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @jitendar-singh

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Apr 12, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot requested review from jitendar-singh and removed request for akashshinde April 12, 2021 07:04
@mfojtik mfojtik added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Apr 14, 2021
@mfojtik
Copy link
Member

mfojtik commented Apr 14, 2021

🚀 Approved for z-stream by score: 1.50

@waveywaves
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@waveywaves
Copy link
Contributor Author

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@waveywaves: Overrode contexts on behalf of waveywaves: ci/prow/e2e-aws

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit e2af0ae into openshift:release-4.5 Apr 15, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@waveywaves: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 1929120 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

[release 4.5] Bug 1929120: update kubernetes-client-api

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

waveywaves added a commit to waveywaves/jenkins that referenced this pull request Apr 20, 2021
…_4.5"

This reverts commit e2af0ae, reversing
changes made to c56dd77.
waveywaves added a commit to waveywaves/jenkins that referenced this pull request Apr 20, 2021
…_4.5"

This reverts commit e2af0ae, reversing
changes made to a3eca23.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-urgent Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is urgent for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants