Bug 1972351: Bump jenkins version 2.289.1 #1283

akram · 2021-06-15T17:27:15Z

No description provided.

openshift-ci · 2021-06-15T17:36:56Z

@akram: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1972351, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.9.0" release, but it targets "---" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 1972351: Bump jenkins version 2.289.1

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

akram · 2021-06-15T17:37:41Z

/bugzilla refresh

openshift-ci · 2021-06-15T17:37:48Z

@akram: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1972351, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug

bug is open, matching expected state (open)
bug target release (4.9.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.9.0)
bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @jitendar-singh

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

akram · 2021-06-15T17:38:21Z

/cherry-pick release-4.8

openshift-cherrypick-robot · 2021-06-15T17:38:22Z

@akram: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-4.8 in a new PR and assign it to you.

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.8

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

jkhelil · 2021-06-16T07:40:05Z

/lgtm

akram · 2021-06-16T08:13:18Z

/bugzilla refresh

openshift-ci · 2021-06-16T08:13:23Z

@akram: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1972351, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.9.0" release, but it targets "---" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

akram · 2021-06-16T08:14:04Z

flake:

level=error msg=Error: [ERR]: Error building changeset: InvalidChangeBatch: [Tried to create resource record set [name='api-int.ci-op-rhwy6tr6-93a8f.origin-ci-int-aws.dev.rhcloud.com.', type='A'] but it already exists]
level=error msg=	status code: 400, request id: fdf6743a-2a4d-4f06-adb4-57b9a98e7a8b

/retest

openshift-bot · 2021-06-16T09:10:31Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

akram · 2021-06-16T09:49:20Z

flake:

ps://api.ci-op-6qnf70k8-93a8f.origin-ci-int-aws.dev.rhcloud.com:6443/api?timeout=32s": dial tcp 52.52.235.121:6443: connect: connection refused, skipping gathering machineconfigs.machineconfiguration.openshift.io due to error: Get "https://api.ci-op-6qnf70k8-93a8f.origin-ci-int-aws.dev.rhcloud.com:6443/api?timeout=32s": dial tcp 52.52.235.121:6443: connect: connection refused, skipping gathering kubeletconfigs.machineconfiguration.openshift.io due to error: Get "https://api.ci-op-6qnf70k8-93a8f.origin-ci-int-aws.dev.rhcloud.com:6443/api?timeout=32s": dial tcp 52.52.235.121:6443: connect: connection refused, skipping gathering containerruntimeconfigs.machineconfiguration.openshift.io due to error: Get "https://api.ci-op-6qnf70k8-93a8f.origin-ci-int-aws.dev.rhcloud.com:6443/api?timeout=32s": dial tcp 52.52.235.121:6443: connect: connection refused, skipping gathering configs.samples.operator.openshift.io/cluster due to error: Get "https://api.ci-op-6qnf70k8-93a8f.origin-ci-int-aws.dev.rhcloud.com:6443/api?timeout=32s": dial tcp 52.52.235.121:6443: connect: connection refused, skipping gathering namespaces/openshift-cluster-samples-operator due to error: Get "https://api.ci-op-6qnf70k8-93a8f.origin-ci-int-aws.dev.rhcloud.com:6443/api/v1/namespaces/openshift-cluster-samples-operator": dial tcp 52.52.235.121:6443: connect: connection refused, skipping gathering namespaces/openshift due to error: Get "https://api.ci-op-6qnf70k8-93a8f.origin-ci-int-aws.dev.rhcloud.com:6443/api/v1/namespaces/openshift": dial tcp 52.52.235.121:6443: connect: connection refused]The connection to the server api.ci-op-6qnf70k8-93a8f.origin-ci-int-aws.dev.rhcloud.com:6443 was refused - did you specify the right host or port?

/retest

akram · 2021-06-16T09:50:36Z

/bugzilla refresh

openshift-ci · 2021-06-16T09:50:41Z

@akram: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1972351, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug

bug is open, matching expected state (open)
bug target release (4.9.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.9.0)
bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @jitendar-singh

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2021-06-16T10:28:33Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

akram · 2021-06-16T10:29:16Z

Flake again

level=error msg=Error: [ERR]: Error building changeset: InvalidChangeBatch: [Tried to create resource record set [name='api.ci-op-6qnf70k8-93a8f.origin-ci-int-aws.dev.rhcloud.com.', type='A'] but it already exists]
level=error msg=	status code: 400, request id: 7f70e769-c8bc-4fd9-b91*-5e6999ac718*
level=error
level=error msg=  on ../tmp/openshift-install-4797*8636/route53/base.tf line 4*, in resource "aws_route53_record" "api_external_alias":
level=error msg=  4*: resource "aws_route53_record" "api_external_alias" {

/retest

openshift-bot · 2021-06-16T13:03:30Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-06-16T13:15:32Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

akram · 2021-06-16T15:19:25Z

/hold
wait for a bit, until flakes get stabilized

akram · 2021-06-17T09:24:18Z

/lgtm
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-jenkins
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws

openshift-ci · 2021-06-17T09:24:19Z

@akram: you cannot LGTM your own PR.

In response to this:

/lgtm
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-jenkins
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci · 2021-06-17T09:24:30Z

@akram: Overrode contexts on behalf of akram: ci/prow/e2e-aws, ci/prow/e2e-aws-jenkins

In response to this:

/lgtm
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-jenkins
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

akram · 2021-06-17T09:24:41Z

/hold cancel

jkhelil · 2021-06-17T13:08:52Z

/lgtm
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-jenkins
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws

openshift-ci · 2021-06-17T13:09:05Z

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: akram, jkhelil

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

~~OWNERS~~ [akram,jkhelil]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

openshift-ci · 2021-06-17T13:09:11Z

@jkhelil: Overrode contexts on behalf of jkhelil: ci/prow/e2e-aws, ci/prow/e2e-aws-jenkins

In response to this:

/lgtm
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-jenkins
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

gabemontero · 2021-06-17T13:20:20Z

@jkhelil @akram I see you all overrode the e2e's

are we sure this change will fix the e2e-*-builds failures we are seeing in openshift/origin and other repos?

did you confirm that whatever issues you were seeing were beyond the e2e-*-builds failures? ... not seeing any detail here on the precise nature of any flakes you encountered here.

@adambkaplan FYI

jkhelil · 2021-06-17T13:21:13Z

@gabemontero Yes we need to new kubernetes-client-api, bumped in the PR

gabemontero · 2021-06-17T13:37:35Z

@gabemontero Yes we need to new kubernetes-client-api, bumped in the PR

ok thanks @jkhelil

openshift-ci · 2021-06-17T13:41:09Z

@akram: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws	`f1f2e9b`	link	`/test e2e-aws`

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

openshift-ci · 2021-06-17T13:41:54Z

@akram: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

openshift/jenkins#1283

Bugzilla bug 1972351 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1972351: Bump jenkins version 2.289.1

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-cherrypick-robot · 2021-06-17T13:42:28Z

@akram: new pull request created: #1290

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.8

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

akram · 2021-06-18T12:22:08Z

ART requests:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ART-3066
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ART-3065

openshift-ci bot requested review from otaviof and sbose78 June 15, 2021 17:27

openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 15, 2021

akram changed the title ~~Bump jenkins version 2.289.1~~ Bug 1972351: Bump jenkins version 2.289.1 Jun 15, 2021

openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/severity-unspecified Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is unspecified for the PR. bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jun 15, 2021

openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jun 15, 2021

openshift-ci bot requested a review from jitendar-singh June 15, 2021 17:37

Bump jenkins version 2.289.1

f1f2e9b

akram force-pushed the 4.9-update-jenkins-version-2.282.1 branch from 9d4ed3f to f1f2e9b Compare June 15, 2021 23:33

openshift-ci bot assigned jkhelil Jun 16, 2021

openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 16, 2021

openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jun 16, 2021

openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 16, 2021

openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 17, 2021

gabemontero mentioned this pull request Jun 17, 2021

Use UBI8 instead of SCL images openshift/origin#26072

Merged

openshift-merge-robot merged commit 18fb26c into openshift:master Jun 17, 2021

openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Jun 17, 2021

[release-4.8] Bug 1972354: Bump jenkins version 2.289.1 #1290

Closed

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Bug 1972351: Bump jenkins version 2.289.1 #1283

Bug 1972351: Bump jenkins version 2.289.1 #1283

akram commented Jun 15, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 15, 2021

akram commented Jun 15, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 15, 2021

akram commented Jun 15, 2021

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Jun 15, 2021

jkhelil commented Jun 16, 2021

akram commented Jun 16, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 16, 2021

akram commented Jun 16, 2021

openshift-bot commented Jun 16, 2021

akram commented Jun 16, 2021

akram commented Jun 16, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 16, 2021

openshift-bot commented Jun 16, 2021

akram commented Jun 16, 2021

openshift-bot commented Jun 16, 2021

openshift-bot commented Jun 16, 2021

akram commented Jun 16, 2021

akram commented Jun 17, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 17, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 17, 2021

akram commented Jun 17, 2021

jkhelil commented Jun 17, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 17, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 17, 2021

gabemontero commented Jun 17, 2021

jkhelil commented Jun 17, 2021

gabemontero commented Jun 17, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 17, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 17, 2021

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Jun 17, 2021

akram commented Jun 18, 2021

Bug 1972351: Bump jenkins version 2.289.1 #1283

Bug 1972351: Bump jenkins version 2.289.1 #1283

Conversation

akram commented Jun 15, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 15, 2021

akram commented Jun 15, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 15, 2021

akram commented Jun 15, 2021

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Jun 15, 2021

jkhelil commented Jun 16, 2021

akram commented Jun 16, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 16, 2021

akram commented Jun 16, 2021

openshift-bot commented Jun 16, 2021

akram commented Jun 16, 2021

akram commented Jun 16, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 16, 2021

openshift-bot commented Jun 16, 2021

akram commented Jun 16, 2021

openshift-bot commented Jun 16, 2021

openshift-bot commented Jun 16, 2021

akram commented Jun 16, 2021

akram commented Jun 17, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 17, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 17, 2021

akram commented Jun 17, 2021

jkhelil commented Jun 17, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 17, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 17, 2021

gabemontero commented Jun 17, 2021

jkhelil commented Jun 17, 2021

gabemontero commented Jun 17, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 17, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 17, 2021

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Jun 17, 2021

akram commented Jun 18, 2021