Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

JKNS-384: Update Jenkins base images to RHEL9 #1769

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

avinal
Copy link
Member

@avinal avinal commented Apr 18, 2024

  • update ubi7 to ubi9

Signed-off-by: Avinal Kumar avinal@redhat.com

- update ubi7 to ubi9

Signed-off-by: Avinal Kumar <avinal@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Apr 18, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 18, 2024

@avinal: This pull request references JKNS-384 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.16.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

  • update ubi7 to ubi9

Signed-off-by: Avinal Kumar avinal@redhat.com

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Apr 18, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 18, 2024

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 18, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: avinal
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign sayan-biswas for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@avinal
Copy link
Member Author

avinal commented Apr 18, 2024

/test all

@avinal avinal marked this pull request as ready for review April 18, 2024 11:14
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Apr 18, 2024
@avinal
Copy link
Member Author

avinal commented Apr 18, 2024

I think the references to RHEL9 should be updated as well in this PR. Please let me know if that should be a different PR.

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 18, 2024

@avinal: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-jenkins-sync-plugin 0bb5f51 link true /test e2e-aws-jenkins-sync-plugin
ci/prow/e2e-aws-jenkins-client-plugin 0bb5f51 link true /test e2e-aws-jenkins-client-plugin
ci/prow/security 0bb5f51 link false /test security

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@adambkaplan
Copy link
Contributor

We should aim to use RHEL 9/UBI9 in as many spots as possible. Note that there is a lot in this repo that appears to be way out of date, and isn't used either in OpenShift CI or our downstream build systems.

One thing I'd advise is to copy the Dockerfile.rhel8 files to Dockerfile.rhel9, where you then update the base UBI images. That should help make the transition a bit smoother.

@nixpanic
Copy link
Member

It seems this is related to #1766.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants