Adding build support for archs other than amd64

[Pensu]

This PR removes hardcoded amd64 and replaces it with env GOARCH, which enables the build to create binaries for the platform it is running on.

[openshift-ci-robot]

Hi @Pensu. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a openshift member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Pensu
To complete the pull request process, please assign squat
You can assign the PR to them by writing /assign @squat in a comment when ready.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[paulfantom]

@Pensu please look at #15 as this is the same PR. There is also an explanation on why we don't want to merge it and a possible workaround.

/close

[openshift-ci-robot]

@paulfantom: Closed this PR.

In response to this:

@Pensu please look at #15 as this is the same PR. There is also an explanation on why we don't want to merge it and a possible workaround.

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[Pensu]

@Pensu please look at #15 as this is the same PR. There is also an explanation on why we don't want to merge it and a possible workaround.

/close

Oh, didn't see that. Apologies for the noise. Will comment there.