New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[release-4.14] OCPBUGS-20250: limit number of simultaneous client requests #77
[release-4.14] OCPBUGS-20250: limit number of simultaneous client requests #77
Conversation
This change adds an hard-coded limit of 100 simultaneous client requests against the Prometheus service. It avoids exhausting the number of TCP connection requests for clusters with lots of running containers when a client asks for pod metrics on all namespaces (the number of requests is equal to twice the number of all the pods).
Signed-off-by: Simon Pasquier <spasquie@redhat.com>
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-18971 has been cloned as Jira Issue OCPBUGS-20250. Will retitle bug to link to clone. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-20250, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 6 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-20250, which is valid. 6 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/cherrypick release-4.13 |
@simonpasquier: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-4.13 in a new PR and assign it to you. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/jira refresh |
@simonpasquier: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-20250, which is valid. 6 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/label backport-risk-assessed |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: openshift-cherrypick-robot, raptorsun The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@raptorsun: Can not set label backport-risk-assessed: Must be member in one of these teams: [openshift-patch-managers] In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/label backport-risk-assessed |
/unhold |
issue is fixed, steps see from bug comment |
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-20250, which is valid. 6 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-20250: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-20250 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@simonpasquier: new pull request created: #78 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
This is an automated cherry-pick of #76
/assign simonpasquier