Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updating openshift-enterprise-hyperkube images to be consistent with ART #1265

Conversation

openshift-bot
Copy link

@openshift-bot openshift-bot commented May 13, 2022

Updating openshift-enterprise-hyperkube images to be consistent with ART
TLDR:
Component owners, please ensure that this PR merges as it impacts the fidelity
of your CI signal. Patch-manager / leads, this PR is a no-op from a product
perspective -- feel free to manually apply any labels (e.g. bugzilla/valid-bug) to help the
PR merge as long as tests are passing. If the PR is labeled "needs-ok-to-test", this is
to limit costs for re-testing these PRs while they wait for review. Issue /ok-to-test
to remove this tag and help the PR to merge.

Detail:
This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component.
One or more images differ from those being used by ART to create product builds. This
should be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing is accurately
reflecting what customers will experience.

The information within the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment
request: openshift-enterprise-hyperkube.yml.

The vast majority of these PRs are opened because a different Golang version is being
used to build the downstream component. ART compiles most components with the version
of Golang being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release. Exceptions
to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang
version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift
architecture team and communicated to the ART team.

Roles & Responsibilities:

  • Component owners are responsible for ensuring these alignment PRs merge with passing
    tests OR that necessary metadata changes are reported to the ART team: @release-artists
    in #aos-art on Slack. If necessary, the changes required by this pull request can be
    introduced with a separate PR opened by the component team. Once the repository is aligned,
    this PR will be closed automatically.
  • Patch-manager or those with sufficient privileges within this repository may add
    any required labels to ensure the PR merges once tests are passing. Downstream builds
    are already being built with these changes. Merging this PR only improves the fidelity
    of our CI.

ART has been configured to reconcile your CI build root image (see https://docs.ci.openshift.org/docs/architecture/ci-operator/#build-root-image).
In order for your upstream .ci-operator.yaml configuration to be honored, you must set the following in your openshift/release ci-operator configuration file:

build_root:
  from_repository: true

If you have any questions about this pull request, please reach out to @art-team in the #aos-art coreos slack channel.

@openshift-bot openshift-bot added backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. labels May 13, 2022
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the backports/unvalidated-commits Indicates that not all commits come to merged upstream PRs. label May 13, 2022
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-bot: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@openshift-bot openshift-bot force-pushed the art-consistency-openshift-4.11-openshift-enterprise-hyperkube branch from c92c39f to f629f5c Compare May 13, 2022 12:38
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from soltysh and sttts May 13, 2022 12:39
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented May 13, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: openshift-bot
To complete the pull request process, please assign deads2k after the PR has been reviewed.
You can assign the PR to them by writing /assign @deads2k in a comment when ready.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented May 13, 2022

@openshift-bot: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-agnostic-cmd f629f5c link false /test e2e-agnostic-cmd
ci/prow/e2e-gcp f629f5c link true /test e2e-gcp
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-upgrade f629f5c link true /test e2e-gcp-upgrade
ci/prow/unit f629f5c link true /test unit
ci/prow/e2e-azure-upgrade f629f5c link true /test e2e-azure-upgrade
ci/prow/e2e-aws-csi f629f5c link false /test e2e-aws-csi
ci/prow/verify f629f5c link true /test verify
ci/prow/k8s-e2e-gcp-serial f629f5c link true /test k8s-e2e-gcp-serial
ci/prow/k8s-e2e-conformance-aws f629f5c link true /test k8s-e2e-conformance-aws
ci/prow/images f629f5c link true /test images
ci/prow/verify-commits f629f5c link true /test verify-commits
ci/prow/integration f629f5c link true /test integration

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. backports/unvalidated-commits Indicates that not all commits come to merged upstream PRs. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

9 participants