Rebase 1.24.2 #1291
Closed
Rebase 1.24.2 #1291
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
A previous commit updated the containerd version used on Windows nodes from 1.5.4 to 1.6.2. However, the folder structure of the containerd releases changed since then from: cni/$binary.exe to: cni/bin/$binary.exe Because of this, the Windows nodes do not have the necessary CNI binaries needed to setup the pod networks.
Change-Id: Ic231ce9a5504d3aae4191901d7eb5fe69bf017ac
Change-Id: I99206f35f6f145054c005ab362c792e71b9b15f4
In some rare race conditions, the job controller might create new pods after the job is declared finished. Change-Id: I8a00429c8845463259cd7f82bb3c241d0011583c
Change-Id: Ia6e86da5e66422fdb653c1ee60864a1c79233ea6
During upgrade when a CP node is missing the old / legacy "master" taint, assume the user has manually removed it to allow workloads to schedule. In such cases do not re-taint the node with the new "control-plane" taint.
SpecAggregator's GetAPIServiceNames method returned empty APIService name by mistake, causing OpenAPI controller handling an invalid APIService continuously. Signed-off-by: Quan Tian <qtian@vmware.com>
Resolved issues with proxy rules taking a long time to be synced on Windows, by caching HNS data. In particular, the following HNS data will be cached for the context of syncProxyRules: * HNS endpoints * HNS load balancers
Otherwise the event handler might not be called. Change-Id: I23c93c2251b411430a0f2469686db6355d84af2f
…managed outside of service controller
The cached token authenticator returns a cache value. The group adder changes it.
Signed-off-by: cpanato <ctadeu@gmail.com>
openshift-ci-robot
added
the
backports/unvalidated-commits
|
@ravisantoshgudimetla: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated. The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:
Comment |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: ravisantoshgudimetla The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
@ravisantoshgudimetla: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated. The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:
Comment |
|
@ravisantoshgudimetla: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated. The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:
Comment |
… client in apiserver_request_total
the 1.24 test suite will try to find both old + new taint on the CP nodes, but kubeadm 1.25 will only add the new taint. https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/110095/files#r875034086
Signed-off-by: cpanato <ctadeu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sanskar Jaiswal <jaiswalsanskar078@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sanskar Jaiswal <jaiswalsanskar078@gmail.com>
ravisantoshgudimetla
force-pushed
the
rebase-1.24.2
branch
from
3d84cbe
to
05f6d8a
Compare
|
@ravisantoshgudimetla: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated. The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:
Comment |
|
@ravisantoshgudimetla: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. Mark the issue as fresh by commenting If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /lifecycle stale |
openshift-ci
bot
added
the
lifecycle/stale
openshift-merge-robot
added
the
needs-rebase
|
@ravisantoshgudimetla: PR needs rebase. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity. Mark the issue as fresh by commenting If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /lifecycle rotten |
openshift-ci
bot
added
lifecycle/rotten
|
Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity. Reopen the issue by commenting /close |
|
@openshift-bot: Closed this PR. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What type of PR is this?
What this PR does / why we need it:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?
Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.: