Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WIP: Fix iSCSI over ipv6 #1292

Closed
wants to merge 3,270 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

jsafrane
Copy link

Addresses in the Kubernetes API objects (PV, Pod) have [] around IPv6
addresses, while addresses in /dev/ and /sys/ have addresses without them.

Add/remove [] as needed.

WIP: testing in OCP before sending to Kubernetes

azylinski and others added 30 commits May 12, 2022 14:27
create (POST) custom resources should be scope:resource
…pifield-comment

cleanup: modify the comments of NodeInclusionPolicy
…cking

Cleanup no-longer used storage cleanup method
Signed-off-by: Monis Khan <mok@vmware.com>
…stats

kubelet/stats: update cadvisor stats provider with new log location
don't skip Feature:EphemeralStorage based on skipper
Given kubeadm 1.25 only supports kubelet 1.25 and 1.24,
1.23 related logic around dockershim can be removed.

- Don't clean the directories
/var/lib/dockershim, /var/runkubernetes, /var/lib/cni
- Pass the CRISocket directly to the kubelet
--container-runtime-endpoint flag without extra handling
of dockershim
- No longer apply the --container-runtime=remote flag
as that is the only possible value in 1.24 and 1.25
- Update unit tests


Note: we are still passing --pod-infra-container-image
to avoid the pause image to be GCed by the kubelet.
Signed-off-by: Steve Kuznetsov <skuznets@redhat.com>
…late-versioner

storage: move the APIObjectVersioner definition to storage
…late-continue

storage: move continue token definition to storage
…auth_plugins

Remove gcp and azure auth plugins
Signed-off-by: Steve Kuznetsov <skuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve Kuznetsov <skuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve Kuznetsov <skuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve Kuznetsov <skuznets@redhat.com>
Use typed ImageID for imageutils images
…et-flags-without-dockershim

kubeadm: perform dockershim cleanup for 1.25
Minor cleanups in integration test shutdown
k8s-ci-robot and others added 8 commits May 31, 2022 08:44
…atch-comments

Cleanup: modify unmatch comments with stopCh
Our tests are mostly error based and explicit error typing allows
us to test against error types directly. Having made this change also
makes it obvious that our test coverage was lacking in two branches,
specifically, we were previously not testing empty start keys nor were
we testing for invalid start RVs.
…omote

remove deprecated metric and promote the replacement to STABLE
…o-registry.k8s.io

Move from k8s.gcr.io to registry.k8s.io
…ryConfigFix

fix the registry configuration
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the backports/unvalidated-commits Indicates that not all commits come to merged upstream PRs. label Jun 21, 2022
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jun 21, 2022
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@jsafrane: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from mfojtik and sttts June 21, 2022 08:49
@jsafrane jsafrane changed the base branch from master to release-4.10 June 21, 2022 09:56
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 21, 2022

@jsafrane: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

WIP: Fix iSCSI over ipv6

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jun 21, 2022
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@jsafrane: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jun 21, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 21, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jsafrane
To complete the pull request process, please assign mfojtik after the PR has been reviewed.
You can assign the PR to them by writing /assign @mfojtik in a comment when ready.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Addresses in the Kubernetes API objects (PV, Pod) have `[]` around IPv6
addresses, while addresses in /dev/ and /sys/ have addresses without them.

Add/remove `[]` as needed.
@jsafrane
Copy link
Author

/close

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@jsafrane: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jun 21, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 21, 2022

@jsafrane: PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot closed this Jun 21, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 21, 2022

@jsafrane: Closed this PR.

In response to this:

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files label Jun 21, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 21, 2022

@jsafrane: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/k8s-e2e-aws-serial 232ec4d link false /test k8s-e2e-aws-serial
ci/prow/e2e-gcp 232ec4d link true /test e2e-gcp
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-upgrade 232ec4d link true /test e2e-gcp-upgrade
ci/prow/verify 232ec4d link true /test verify
ci/prow/k8s-e2e-aws 232ec4d link false /test k8s-e2e-aws
ci/prow/k8s-e2e-gcp-serial 232ec4d link true /test k8s-e2e-gcp-serial
ci/prow/integration 232ec4d link true /test integration
ci/prow/e2e-agnostic-cmd 232ec4d link false /test e2e-agnostic-cmd
ci/prow/e2e-aws-crun 232ec4d link false /test e2e-aws-crun
ci/prow/images 232ec4d link true /test images
ci/prow/verify-commits 232ec4d link true /test verify-commits
ci/prow/e2e-aws-cgroupsv2 232ec4d link false /test e2e-aws-cgroupsv2
ci/prow/e2e-aws-csi 232ec4d link false /test e2e-aws-csi
ci/prow/unit 232ec4d link true /test unit
ci/prow/e2e-aws-fips 232ec4d link true /test e2e-aws-fips
ci/prow/artifacts 232ec4d link true /test artifacts
ci/prow/e2e-aws-serial 232ec4d link true /test e2e-aws-serial
ci/prow/e2e-openstack-csi-manila 232ec4d link false /test e2e-openstack-csi-manila
ci/prow/k8s-e2e-conformance-aws 232ec4d link true /test k8s-e2e-conformance-aws
ci/prow/k8s-e2e-gcp 232ec4d link true /test k8s-e2e-gcp
ci/prow/verify-commits 109c72aa9c0c1090e38448a574931f23c45c9ce2 link true /test verify-commits

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backports/unvalidated-commits Indicates that not all commits come to merged upstream PRs. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet