Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

OCPNODE-1892: Bump k8s to 1.29.1 #1858

Merged
merged 45 commits into from Jan 22, 2024
Merged

OCPNODE-1892: Bump k8s to 1.29.1 #1858

merged 45 commits into from Jan 22, 2024

Conversation

sairameshv
Copy link
Member

Bump k8s api to 1.29.1

/assign @soltysh

k8s-release-robot and others added 30 commits December 13, 2023 09:09
@k8s-release-robot
Update CHANGELOG/CHANGELOG-1.29.md for v1.29.0
e1e60c9
@mimowo
Add unit test for Job Controller for panic when PodFailurePolicy is u…
ee9a55c 
…sed on 1.28
@uablrek
kube-proxy: Fix etp:Local for externalIPs
85ff8c0 
The problem was introduced by PR kubernetes#108460
@sanposhiho
Revert "scheduler/NodeUnschedulable: reduce pod scheduling latency"
95751b4 
This reverts commit 28dbe8a.
@sanposhiho
Revert "scheduler/nodeaffinity: reduce pod scheduling latency"
9abd608 
This reverts commit 1d88bf9.
@jpbetz
Wire in field dropping for CRDs
ce51380
@jsafrane
Fix CSI migration for vSphere volumes
62d0bd7 
Restore `migratedPlugins` entry for in-tree vSphere volumes and mark them
as migrated. Otherwise the CSI volume plugin ignores in-tree vSphere
volumes and they will never get attached / mounted by CSI migration.

The entry in `migratedPlugins` was incorrectly removed during
CSIMigrationvSphere feature gate removal.
@gnufied
Fix device uncertain errors on reboot
910fa60
@gnufied
Add tests for checking of uncertain device paths
d30fda3
@gnufied
Use a separate function for checking if device was reconstructed
40d8e40
@carlory
fix falky test pkg/registry/core/persistentvolume/storage TestUpdateS…
4a59742 
…tatus
@caohe
fix(scheduler): fix incorrect loop logic in MultiPoint to avoid a plu…
37717c1 
…gin being loaded multiple times

Signed-off-by: caohe <caohe9603@gmail.com>
@cici37
Keep presence cost to 0 to ensure backward compatibility.
ed501c1
@cici37
Address comment
a5f64b7
@cvvz
fix: 119921
4b85540
@cvvz
fix
b10ad75
@cvvz
fix
00045c3
@cvvz
add ut
05937cb
@MadhavJivrajani
.*: bump golang.org/x/tools to v0.16.1
b055126 
Bumping tools to include the fix for a nil pointer
deref error in go/types. See golang/go#64812
for more details.

This fix is needed for when we bump to go1.22.

Signed-off-by: Madhav Jivrajani <madhav.jiv@gmail.com>
@k8s-ci-robot
Merge pull request kubernetes#122344 from jsafrane/automated-cherry-p…
d8c20a0 
…ick-of-#122341-upstream-release-1.29

Automated cherry pick of kubernetes#122341: Fix CSI migration for vSphere volumes
@k8s-ci-robot
Merge pull request kubernetes#122343 from jpbetz/automated-cherry-pic…
4e50a91 
…k-of-#122329-origin-release-1.29

Automated cherry pick of kubernetes#122329: Wire in field dropping for CRDs
@k8s-ci-robot
Merge pull request kubernetes#122361 from carlory/automated-cherry-pi…
5841973 
…ck-of-#122011-upstream-release-1.29

Automated cherry pick of kubernetes#122011: fix falky test pkg/registry/core/persistentvolume/storage
@k8s-ci-robot
Merge pull request kubernetes#122313 from mimowo/automated-cherry-pic…
f0dd7d6 
…k-of-#122261-upstream-release-1.29

Automated cherry pick of kubernetes#122261: Add unit test for Job Controller for panic when PodFailurePolicy is used
@k8s-ci-robot
Merge pull request kubernetes#122323 from uablrek/automated-cherry-pi…
2785b20 
…ck-of-#121919-upstream-release-1.29

Automated cherry pick of kubernetes#121919: kube-proxy: Fix etp:Local for externalIPs
@k8s-ci-robot
Merge pull request kubernetes#122326 from sanposhiho/automated-cherry…
fb3fe3a 
…-pick-of-#122288-upstream-release-1.29

Automated cherry pick of kubernetes#122288: Revert "scheduler/NodeUnschedulable: reduce pod scheduling
@k8s-ci-robot
Merge pull request kubernetes#122327 from sanposhiho/automated-cherry…
b8320b7 
…-pick-of-#122285-upstream-release-1.29

Automated cherry pick of kubernetes#122285: Revert "scheduler/nodeaffinity: reduce pod scheduling
@ardaguclu
Initialize default attach func regardless of the value of flag
cde050c
@jiahuif @liangyuanpeng
use context for lazy evaluation.
865f214
@Jefftree
Make OpenAPIGetter tolerant of nil
0da2984
@k8s-ci-robot
Merge pull request kubernetes#122559 from Jefftree/automated-cherry-p…
73b4bf2 
…ick-of-#122346-upstream-release-1.29

Automated cherry pick of kubernetes#122346: Make OpenAPIGetter tolerant of nil
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added backports/unvalidated-commits Indicates that not all commits come to merged upstream PRs. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. labels Jan 19, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Jan 19, 2024 •
edited by openshift-ci bot

@sairameshv: This pull request references OCPNODE-1892 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Bump k8s api to 1.29.1

/assign @soltysh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@sairameshv: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files label Jan 19, 2024
@sairameshv
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

1 similar comment
@sairameshv
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@soltysh soltysh mentioned this pull request Jan 19, 2024
Merged
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@sairameshv: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@sairameshv
UPSTREAM: <drop>: manually resolve conflicts
8e5e43d 
Signed-off-by: Sai Ramesh Vanka <svanka@redhat.com>
@sairameshv
UPSTREAM: <drop>: hack/update-vendor.sh, make update and update image
62b6169 
Signed-off-by: Sai Ramesh Vanka <svanka@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@sairameshv: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@sairameshv
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

2 similar comments
@sairameshv
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@sairameshv
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@sairameshv
Copy link
Member Author

The failure seems to be flaky. Re-triggering the failed job
/retest

soltysh
soltysh approved these changes Jan 22, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@soltysh soltysh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve
/remove-label backports/unvalidated-commits
/label backports/validated-commits

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added backports/validated-commits Indicates that all commits come to merged upstream PRs. and removed backports/unvalidated-commits Indicates that not all commits come to merged upstream PRs. labels Jan 22, 2024
@openshift-ci OpenShift CI
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 22, 2024

@sairameshv: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 22, 2024
@openshift-ci OpenShift CI
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 22, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sairameshv, soltysh

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 22, 2024
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 0e0d15b into openshift:master Jan 22, 2024
23 checks passed
@openshift-bot
Copy link

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

This PR has been included in build openshift-enterprise-pod-container-v4.16.0-202401221133.p0.g0e0d15b.assembly.stream for distgit openshift-enterprise-pod.
All builds following this will include this PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@soltysh soltysh soltysh approved these changes

@mfojtik mfojtik Awaiting requested review from mfojtik

@sjenning sjenning Awaiting requested review from sjenning

Assignees

@soltysh soltysh

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backports/validated-commits Indicates that all commits come to merged upstream PRs. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet