Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bug 1868750: UPSTREAM: <drop>: don't use dynamic tokens for KCM #320

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Aug 25, 2020

Conversation

deads2k
Copy link

@deads2k deads2k commented Aug 21, 2020

be sure to drop this commit/false below in 4.7. The cloud credential operator is updating the issuer URL in 4.6
https://github.com/openshift/cloud-credential-operator/blob/8d54516/pkg/operator/oidcdiscoveryendpoint/controller.go#L244-L271
This causes the previously issued to tokens to be invalid. This transition should only happen in 4.6 and the name should
be stabl-ish from 4.6 to 4.7, so we can go back to this dynamic client without issues.

be sure to drop this commit/`false` below in 4.7.  The cloud credential operator is updating the issuer URL in 4.6
https://github.com/openshift/cloud-credential-operator/blob/8d54516/pkg/operator/oidcdiscoveryendpoint/controller.go#L244-L271
This causes the previously issued to tokens to be invalid.  This transition should only happen in 4.6 and the name should
be stabl-ish from 4.6 to 4.7, so we can go back to this dynamic client without issues.
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/severity-urgent Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is urgent for the branch this PR is targeting. label Aug 21, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@deads2k: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1868750, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.6.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.6.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to this:

bug 1868750: UPSTREAM: : don't use dynamic tokens for KCM

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Aug 21, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: deads2k

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 21, 2020
@deads2k
Copy link
Author

deads2k commented Aug 21, 2020

/retest

@deads2k deads2k added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 21, 2020
@deads2k
Copy link
Author

deads2k commented Aug 21, 2020

@soltysh indicated it was ok in slack. tagging

@deads2k
Copy link
Author

deads2k commented Aug 21, 2020

/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

6 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@tnozicka
Copy link

/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

6 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@deads2k
Copy link
Author

deads2k commented Aug 25, 2020

gcp and fips are failing on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1872282

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-fips
/override ci/prow/e2e-gcp

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@deads2k: /override requires a failed status context to operate on.
The following unknown contexts were given:

  • ci/prow/e2e-aws-fips

Only the following contexts were expected:

  • ci/prow/e2e-aws-csi
  • ci/prow/e2e-aws-fips
  • ci/prow/e2e-aws-serial
  • ci/prow/e2e-cmd
  • ci/prow/e2e-conformance-k8s
  • ci/prow/e2e-gcp
  • ci/prow/e2e-gcp-upgrade
  • ci/prow/images
  • ci/prow/integration
  • ci/prow/k8s-e2e-gcp
  • ci/prow/unit
  • ci/prow/verify
  • ci/prow/verify-commits
  • tide

In response to this:

gcp and fips are failing on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1872282

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-fips
/override ci/prow/e2e-gcp

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@deads2k
Copy link
Author

deads2k commented Aug 25, 2020

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-fips
/override ci/prow/e2e-gcp

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@deads2k: Overrode contexts on behalf of deads2k: ci/prow/e2e-aws-fips, ci/prow/e2e-gcp

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-fips
/override ci/prow/e2e-gcp

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@deads2k
Copy link
Author

deads2k commented Aug 25, 2020

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-fips
/override ci/prow/e2e-gcp

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@deads2k: Overrode contexts on behalf of deads2k: ci/prow/e2e-aws-fips, ci/prow/e2e-gcp

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-fips
/override ci/prow/e2e-gcp

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@deads2k
Copy link
Author

deads2k commented Aug 25, 2020

/override ci/prow/k8s-e2e-gcp

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@deads2k: Overrode contexts on behalf of deads2k: ci/prow/k8s-e2e-gcp

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/k8s-e2e-gcp

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit aaf4ce1 into openshift:master Aug 25, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@deads2k: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: openshift/kubernetes#320. Bugzilla bug 1868750 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

bug 1868750: UPSTREAM: : don't use dynamic tokens for KCM

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-urgent Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is urgent for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants