Bug 1942630: UPSTREAM: 96789: Choosing the right source VIP for local endpoints

[sebsoto]

This fixes an issue where LoadBalancers would stop directing traffic to Windows pods, when multiple pods were behind the LoadBalancer.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@sebsoto: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1942630, which is invalid:

• expected the bug to target the "4.6.z" release, but it targets "4.6.0" instead
• expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1905950 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead
• expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1942628 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead
• expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1905950 to target a release in 4.7.0, 4.7.z, but it targets "4.8.0" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 1942630: UPSTREAM: 96789: Choosing the right source VIP for local endpoints

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@sebsoto: the contents of this pull request could be automatically validated.

The following commits are valid:

• c494025|UPSTREAM: 96789: Choosing the right source VIP for local endpoints: the upstream PR kubernetes/kubernetes#96789 has merged

[sebsoto]

/bugzilla refresh

[openshift-ci-robot]

@sebsoto: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1942630, which is invalid:

• expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1942628 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[aravindhp]

/cc @dcbw @JacobTanenbaum

[sebsoto]

/bugzilla refresh

[openshift-ci-robot]

@sebsoto: An error was encountered querying GitHub for users with public email (sgao@redhat.com) for bug 1942630 on the Bugzilla server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com. No known errors were detected, please see the full error message for details.

Full error message.

non-200 OK status code: 403 Forbidden body: "{\n \"documentation_url\": \"https://docs.github.com/en/free-pro-team@latest/rest/overview/resources-in-the-rest-api#abuse-rate-limits\",\n \"message\": \"You have triggered an abuse detection mechanism. Please wait a few minutes before you try again.\"\n}\n"

Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[sebsoto]

/retest

[sebsoto]

/bugzilla refresh

[openshift-ci-robot]

@sebsoto: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1942630, which is valid.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug

• bug is open, matching expected state (open)
• bug target release (4.6.z) matches configured target release for branch (4.6.z)
• bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
• dependent bug Bugzilla bug 1942628 is in the state VERIFIED, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE))
• dependent Bugzilla bug 1942628 targets the "4.7.z" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.7.0, 4.7.z
• bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @sgaoshang

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[dcbw]

/lgtm

[sttts]

/hold

this branch is not intended for kube-proxy.

[sttts]

As agreed on Slack, WMCO will move away in 4.8 from vendoring the master and release branches of this repository. They are not meant to be consumed by other components and might break at any time for their use-case.

For 4.6, we will accept this carry to keep the builds working.

/hold cancel

[sttts]

/approve

[openshift-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dcbw, sebsoto, sttts

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• DOWNSTREAM_OWNERS [sttts]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[deads2k]

Jira story here: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/WINC-593

[openshift-ci-robot]

@sebsoto: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

• openshift/kubernetes#639

Bugzilla bug 1942630 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1942630: UPSTREAM: 96789: Choosing the right source VIP for local endpoints

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.