New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bug 1952917: UPSTREAM: 100228: For LoadBalancer Service type don't create a HNS policy for empty or invalid external loadbalancer IP #697
Conversation
…licy for empty or invalid external loadbalancer IP
@aravindhp: An error was encountered searching for bug 1946628 on the Bugzilla server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com. No known errors were detected, please see the full error message for details. Full error message.
code 102: You are not authorized to access bug #1946628. Most likely the bug has been restricted for internal development processes and we cannot grant access. If you are a Red Hat customer with an active subscription, please visit the Red Hat Customer Portal for assistance with your issue If you are a Fedora Project user and require assistance, please consider using one of the mailing lists we host for the Fedora Project.
Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@aravindhp: the contents of this pull request could be automatically validated. The following commits are valid: |
/retitle Bug 1952917: UPSTREAM: 100228: For LoadBalancer Service type don't create a HNS policy for empty or invalid external loadbalancer IP |
@aravindhp: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1952917, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/bugzilla refresh |
@aravindhp: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1952917, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. 6 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/cc @dcbw @JacobTanenbaum |
/retest |
/lgtm |
Upstream merged. /approve |
/retest |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: aravindhp, JacobTanenbaum, sttts The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
1 similar comment
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
@aravindhp: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Bugzilla bug 1952917 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
No description provided.