Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1995804: UPSTREAM: <carry>: rename termination events to use lifecycleSignals #896

Merged

Conversation

tkashem
Copy link

@tkashem tkashem commented Aug 19, 2021

What type of PR is this?

/kind cleanup

What this PR does / why we need it:

rename termination events to use lifecycleSignals

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

NONE

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:


@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. label Aug 19, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the backports/unvalidated-commits Indicates that not all commits come to merged upstream PRs. label Aug 19, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@tkashem: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files label Aug 19, 2021
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from marun and soltysh August 19, 2021 19:20
@tkashem
Copy link
Author

tkashem commented Aug 19, 2021

/hold

wait for #889 to merge and then fixup.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 19, 2021
@tkashem
Copy link
Author

tkashem commented Aug 19, 2021

/assign @sttts

@sttts i think we should use the name of the lifecycleSignals events to be consistent, but let me know if you want to keep the old event names.

@tkashem tkashem changed the title UPSTREAM: <carry>: rename termination events to use lifecycleSignals Bug 1995804: UPSTREAM: <carry>: rename termination events to use lifecycleSignals Aug 19, 2021
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Aug 19, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 19, 2021

@tkashem: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1995804, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.9.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.9.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @wangke19

In response to this:

Bug 1995804: UPSTREAM: : rename termination events to use lifecycleSignals

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from wangke19 August 19, 2021 19:22
@tkashem
Copy link
Author

tkashem commented Aug 19, 2021

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 19, 2021

@tkashem: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1995804, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.9.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.9.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @wangke19

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.


time.Sleep(s.ShutdownDelayDuration)

s.Eventf(corev1.EventTypeNormal, "TerminationMinimalShutdownDurationFinished", "The minimal shutdown duration of %v finished", s.ShutdownDelayDuration)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

have we lost this one?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@tkashem: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

@sttts
Copy link

sttts commented Aug 20, 2021

/lgtm
/approve

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 20, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 20, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sttts, tkashem

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 20, 2021
@tkashem
Copy link
Author

tkashem commented Aug 21, 2021

/retest

3 similar comments
@tkashem
Copy link
Author

tkashem commented Aug 22, 2021

/retest

@tkashem
Copy link
Author

tkashem commented Aug 23, 2021

/retest

@tkashem
Copy link
Author

tkashem commented Aug 24, 2021

/retest

@tkashem
Copy link
Author

tkashem commented Aug 24, 2021

/hold cancel

#889 has merged.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 24, 2021
@tkashem
Copy link
Author

tkashem commented Aug 24, 2021

/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

2 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@tkashem
Copy link
Author

tkashem commented Aug 24, 2021

/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@wallylewis
Copy link

/retest-required

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

9 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@sttts sttts removed the backports/unvalidated-commits Indicates that not all commits come to merged upstream PRs. label Aug 26, 2021
@tkashem
Copy link
Author

tkashem commented Aug 26, 2021

/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 26, 2021

@tkashem: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-agnostic-cmd f52fad0 link /test e2e-agnostic-cmd

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

3 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit db089ad into openshift:master Aug 26, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 26, 2021

@tkashem: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 1995804 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1995804: UPSTREAM: : rename termination events to use lifecycleSignals

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants