New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bug 1995804: UPSTREAM: <carry>: rename termination events to use lifecycleSignals #896
Bug 1995804: UPSTREAM: <carry>: rename termination events to use lifecycleSignals #896
Conversation
@tkashem: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated. The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:
|
/hold wait for #889 to merge and then fixup. |
@tkashem: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1995804, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/bugzilla refresh |
@tkashem: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1995804, which is valid. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
||
time.Sleep(s.ShutdownDelayDuration) | ||
|
||
s.Eventf(corev1.EventTypeNormal, "TerminationMinimalShutdownDurationFinished", "The minimal shutdown duration of %v finished", s.ShutdownDelayDuration) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
have we lost this one?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
98dd0a5
to
f52fad0
Compare
@tkashem: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated. The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:
|
/lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: sttts, tkashem The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/retest |
3 similar comments
/retest |
/retest |
/retest |
/hold cancel #889 has merged. |
/retest |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
2 similar comments
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
1 similar comment
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest-required |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
9 similar comments
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
@tkashem: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
3 similar comments
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
@tkashem: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Bugzilla bug 1995804 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
What type of PR is this?
/kind cleanup
What this PR does / why we need it:
rename termination events to use lifecycleSignals
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?
Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.: