Bug 1993753: UPSTREAM: 104348: Pass additional flags to subpath mount to avoid fla…

[dobsonj]

/cc @openshift/storage

[openshift-ci]

@dobsonj: An error was encountered searching for bug 1993753 on the Bugzilla server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com. No known errors were detected, please see the full error message for details.

Full error message.

code 102: You are not authorized to access bug #1993753. Most likely the bug has been restricted for internal development processes and we cannot grant access. If you are a Red Hat customer with an active subscription, please visit the Red Hat Customer Portal for assistance with your issue If you are a Fedora Project user and require assistance, please consider using one of the mailing lists we host for the Fedora Project.

Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

Bug 1993753: UPSTREAM: 104348: Pass additional flags to subpath mount to avoid fla…

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@dobsonj: the contents of this pull request could be automatically validated.

The following commits are valid:

• fb92e81|UPSTREAM: 104348: Pass additional flags to subpath mount to avoid flakes in certain conditions: the upstream PR kubernetes/kubernetes#104348 has merged

[dobsonj]

/retest
/hold

[dobsonj]

/retest

[dobsonj]

/retest

[jsafrane]

/lgtm
/approve

[jsafrane]

/hold cancel

[mfojtik]

/approve

[mfojtik]

/bugzilla refresh

[openshift-ci]

@mfojtik: An error was encountered searching for bug 1993753 on the Bugzilla server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com. No known errors were detected, please see the full error message for details.

Full error message.

code 102: You are not authorized to access bug #1993753. Most likely the bug has been restricted for internal development processes and we cannot grant access. If you are a Red Hat customer with an active subscription, please visit the Red Hat Customer Portal for assistance with your issue If you are a Fedora Project user and require assistance, please consider using one of the mailing lists we host for the Fedora Project.

Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[duanwei33]

/bugzilla cc-qa

[openshift-ci]

@duanwei33: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1993753, which is invalid:

• expected Bugzilla bug 1993753 to depend on a bug targeting a release in 4.8.0, 4.8.z and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla cc-qa

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[duanwei33]

I'm following JIRA issue DPTP-660 to do the pre-merge verification. Used the cluster-bot launching an env with the still open but Dev-approved PR(s).
The bug is pre-merge verified. So per JIRA issue DPTP-660's Description process, adding QE lgtm:
/lgtm

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dobsonj, duanwei33, jsafrane, mfojtik

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• DOWNSTREAM_OWNERS [mfojtik]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[openshift-bot]

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

[openshift-ci]

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1993753, which is invalid:

• expected Bugzilla bug 1993753 to depend on a bug targeting a release in 4.8.0, 4.8.z and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[hardys]

I'm following JIRA issue DPTP-660 to do the pre-merge verification. Used the cluster-bot launching an env with the still open but Dev-approved PR(s).
The bug is pre-merge verified. So per JIRA issue DPTP-660's Description process, adding QE lgtm:
/lgtm

[patch-manager] I believe we also require the qe-approved label, but I'm taking this comment as approval and will apply the label myself :)

[hardys]

[patch-manager] #940 landed and was verified, this PR has qe-approved from pre-merge testing, adding bugzilla/valid-bug and cherry-pick-approved labels

[openshift-bot]

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

[openshift-ci]

@dobsonj: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-gcp	fb92e81	link	/test e2e-gcp

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[openshift-bot]

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

[openshift-ci]

@dobsonj: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

• openshift/kubernetes#941

Bugzilla bug 1993753 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1993753: UPSTREAM: 104348: Pass additional flags to subpath mount to avoid fla…

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.