Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1855773: Attempt to autodetect interface in nested setups #300

Merged

Conversation

luis5tb
Copy link
Contributor

@luis5tb luis5tb commented Jul 10, 2020

The VLAN and macvlan nested drivers are using [binding]link_iface option
to get the port they should bind the subport to. This isn't ideal as
there's a single config for all kuryr-cni containers in the cluster, so
it's impossible to provide multiple interface names when e.g. different
VM images are used to run workers in the cluster.

In order to make behavior smarter this patch makes sure that when
aforementioned option is not set, kuryr-daemon will attempt to
autodetect the interface it should bind the subport to by trying to find
which iterface kubelet is bound to. This should work fine with OpenShift
setups. If such interface is not found, kuryr-daemon will choose first
non-loopback interface.

Implements: blueprint autodetect-nested-iface
Change-Id: I28e7d10ba4311455bc0c7fcaf28edcb30068a1e5

Manual cherry-pick of #299

The VLAN and macvlan nested drivers are using [binding]link_iface option
to get the port they should bind the subport to. This isn't ideal as
there's a single config for all kuryr-cni containers in the cluster, so
it's impossible to provide multiple interface names when e.g. different
VM images are used to run workers in the cluster.

In order to make behavior smarter this patch makes sure that when
aforementioned option is not set, kuryr-daemon will attempt to
autodetect the interface it should bind the subport to by trying to find
which iterface kubelet is bound to. This should work fine with OpenShift
setups. If such interface is not found, kuryr-daemon will choose first
non-loopback interface.

Implements: blueprint autodetect-nested-iface
Change-Id: I28e7d10ba4311455bc0c7fcaf28edcb30068a1e5
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@luis5tb: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1855773, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1829517 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 1855773: Attempt to autodetect interface in nested setups

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jul 10, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 10, 2020
@dulek
Copy link
Contributor

dulek commented Jul 10, 2020

/lgtm
/approve

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 10, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dulek, luis5tb

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1855773, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1829517 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1855773, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1829517 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1855773, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1829517 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1855773, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1829517 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1855773, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1829517 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1855773, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1829517 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1855773, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1829517 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@luis5tb
Copy link
Contributor Author

luis5tb commented Jul 17, 2020

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Jul 17, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@luis5tb: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1855773, which is valid.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.5.z) matches configured target release for branch (4.5.z)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
  • dependent bug Bugzilla bug 1829517 is in the state VERIFIED, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA))
  • dependent Bugzilla bug 1829517 targets the "4.6.0" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.6.0, 4.6.z
  • bug has dependents

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Jul 17, 2020
@dulek
Copy link
Contributor

dulek commented Jul 28, 2020

/bugzilla refresh

@sdodson sdodson added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Aug 8, 2020
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 59f5652 into openshift:release-4.5 Aug 8, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@luis5tb: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: openshift/kuryr-kubernetes#300. Bugzilla bug 1855773 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1855773: Attempt to autodetect interface in nested setups

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

MaysaMacedo pushed a commit to MaysaMacedo/kuryr-kubernetes-1 that referenced this pull request Jul 1, 2021
Adding status to configmap ca injector controller
MaysaMacedo pushed a commit to MaysaMacedo/kuryr-kubernetes-1 that referenced this pull request Jul 1, 2021
… ... not found"

Adjusting one of the log lines from 482ce00 (added printing to the
log for some errors, 2018-08-26, openshift#300) to match another log line from
that same commit.  There's nothing inherently proxy-ish about the
trusted CA bundle ConfigMap, so we don't need a proxy-specific log
line.  And giving the namespace/name is a more actionable error
message (admins will know which resource they need to chase down).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants