New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[release-4.5] Bug 1874840: Ensure proper cleanup of subports #334
[release-4.5] Bug 1874840: Ensure proper cleanup of subports #334
Conversation
Namespace deletion can be stuck if not all the ports belonging to the associated namespace networks are deleted. This patch enforce proper clean up of subports by: - Ensuring no request/release VIF actions are processed until the pools are recovered by the controller - Ensure if there are subports leftover when removing a namespace those are detached from the pool and deleted regardless of their status Change-Id: I2cb1586fa1f88bab191af0ead22a2b8afca91a3b
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Bugzilla bug 1873449 has been cloned as Bugzilla bug 1874840. Retitling PR to link against new bug. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1874840, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Neutron clears device_owner when port is detached. This means that with pools we need to consider ports without device_owner set when doing cleanup on namespace deletion. Change-Id: Ic38015cba27d8418175027ec4e433df32eae4706
/bugzilla refresh |
@luis5tb: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1874840, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. 6 validation(s) were run on this bug
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/lgtm |
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: luis5tb, openshift-cherrypick-robot The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/bugzilla refresh |
@eparis: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1874840, which is valid. 6 validation(s) were run on this bug
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Bugzilla bug 1874840 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
This is an automated cherry-pick of #333
/assign luis5tb