[release-4.6] Bug 1886696: Add protection from unexpected issues #367

openshift-cherrypick-robot · 2020-10-09T06:58:11Z

This is an automated cherry-pick of #366

/assign luis5tb

This patch adds protection for some problems in Neutron side: - Ports created without IPs - Detached subports that do not have its device_owner reset Depends-On: If23b311ed07578b3fbe85f46aa4a314e6a05b7f3 Change-Id: Ia386274fe5c491432140a770cdd0b1beb969ac24

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-09T06:58:22Z

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Bugzilla bug 1884655 has been cloned as Bugzilla bug 1886696. Retitling PR to link against new bug.
/retitle [release-4.6] Bug 1886696: Add protection from unexpected issues

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-09T06:58:44Z

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1886696, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug

bug is open, matching expected state (open)
bug target release (4.6.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.6.0)
bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
dependent bug Bugzilla bug 1884655 is in the state MODIFIED, which is one of the valid states (MODIFIED, VERIFIED)
dependent Bugzilla bug 1884655 targets the "4.7.0" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.7.0
bug has dependents

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

luis5tb · 2020-10-09T07:00:39Z

/bugzilla refresh

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-09T07:00:43Z

@luis5tb: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1886696, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.6.0" release, but it targets "4.6.z" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

gryf

/lgtm

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-09T07:11:00Z

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: gryf, openshift-cherrypick-robot

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

~~OWNERS~~ [gryf]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

openshift-bot · 2020-10-10T01:01:03Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-10T01:01:06Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1886696, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.6.0" release, but it targets "4.6.z" instead
expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1884655 to be in one of the following states: MODIFIED, VERIFIED, but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-10-11T01:00:31Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-11T01:00:34Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1886696, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.6.0" release, but it targets "4.6.z" instead
expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1884655 to be in one of the following states: MODIFIED, VERIFIED, but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-10-12T01:00:33Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-12T01:00:37Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1886696, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.6.0" release, but it targets "4.6.z" instead
expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1884655 to be in one of the following states: MODIFIED, VERIFIED, but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-10-13T01:00:28Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-13T01:00:40Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1886696, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.6.0" release, but it targets "4.6.z" instead
expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1884655 to be in one of the following states: MODIFIED, VERIFIED, but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-10-14T01:00:13Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-14T01:00:17Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1886696, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.6.0" release, but it targets "4.6.z" instead
expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1884655 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-10-15T01:00:51Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-15T01:00:55Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1886696, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.6.0" release, but it targets "4.6.z" instead
expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1884655 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-10-16T01:00:15Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-16T01:00:18Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1886696, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.6.0" release, but it targets "4.6.z" instead
expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1884655 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-10-17T01:01:07Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-17T01:01:10Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1886696, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.6.0" release, but it targets "4.6.z" instead
expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1884655 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-10-20T01:00:35Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-20T01:00:39Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1886696, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.6.0" release, but it targets "4.6.z" instead
expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1884655 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-10-21T01:01:16Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-21T01:01:20Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1886696, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.6.0" release, but it targets "4.6.z" instead
expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1884655 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-10-22T01:00:37Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-22T01:00:47Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1886696, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1884655 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-10-23T01:01:20Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-23T01:01:24Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1886696, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1884655 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

luis5tb · 2020-10-23T10:16:05Z

/bugzilla refresh

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-23T10:16:12Z

@luis5tb: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1886696, which is valid.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug

bug is open, matching expected state (open)
bug target release (4.6.z) matches configured target release for branch (4.6.z)
bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
dependent bug Bugzilla bug 1884655 is in the state VERIFIED, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA))
dependent Bugzilla bug 1884655 targets the "4.7.0" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.7.0
bug has dependents

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-26T17:01:03Z

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

openshift/kuryr-kubernetes#367

Bugzilla bug 1886696 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot assigned luis5tb Oct 9, 2020

openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Oct 9, 2020

Bug 1884655: Add protection from unexpected issues #366

Merged

openshift-ci-robot requested review from celebdor and MaysaMacedo October 9, 2020 06:58

openshift-ci-robot changed the title ~~[release-4.6] Bug 1884655: Add protection from unexpected issues~~ [release-4.6] Bug 1886696: Add protection from unexpected issues Oct 9, 2020

openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Oct 9, 2020

openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Oct 9, 2020

gryf approved these changes Oct 9, 2020

View reviewed changes

openshift-ci-robot assigned gryf Oct 9, 2020

openshift-ci-robot added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Oct 9, 2020

openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Oct 23, 2020

sdodson added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Oct 26, 2020

openshift-merge-robot merged commit 309482f into openshift:release-4.6 Oct 26, 2020

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

[release-4.6] Bug 1886696: Add protection from unexpected issues #367

[release-4.6] Bug 1886696: Add protection from unexpected issues #367

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Oct 9, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 9, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 9, 2020

luis5tb commented Oct 9, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 9, 2020

gryf left a comment

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 9, 2020

openshift-bot commented Oct 10, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 10, 2020

openshift-bot commented Oct 11, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 11, 2020

openshift-bot commented Oct 12, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 12, 2020

openshift-bot commented Oct 13, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 13, 2020

openshift-bot commented Oct 14, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 14, 2020

openshift-bot commented Oct 15, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 15, 2020

openshift-bot commented Oct 16, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 16, 2020

openshift-bot commented Oct 17, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 17, 2020

openshift-bot commented Oct 20, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 20, 2020

openshift-bot commented Oct 21, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 21, 2020

openshift-bot commented Oct 22, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 22, 2020

openshift-bot commented Oct 23, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 23, 2020

luis5tb commented Oct 23, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 23, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 26, 2020

[release-4.6] Bug 1886696: Add protection from unexpected issues #367

[release-4.6] Bug 1886696: Add protection from unexpected issues #367

Conversation

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Oct 9, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 9, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 9, 2020

luis5tb commented Oct 9, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 9, 2020

gryf left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 9, 2020

openshift-bot commented Oct 10, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 10, 2020

openshift-bot commented Oct 11, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 11, 2020

openshift-bot commented Oct 12, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 12, 2020

openshift-bot commented Oct 13, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 13, 2020

openshift-bot commented Oct 14, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 14, 2020

openshift-bot commented Oct 15, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 15, 2020

openshift-bot commented Oct 16, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 16, 2020

openshift-bot commented Oct 17, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 17, 2020

openshift-bot commented Oct 20, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 20, 2020

openshift-bot commented Oct 21, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 21, 2020

openshift-bot commented Oct 22, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 22, 2020

openshift-bot commented Oct 23, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 23, 2020

luis5tb commented Oct 23, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 23, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 26, 2020