Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release-4.10] OCPBUGS-5345: routes/status resources can leak sensitive data #1418

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jan 4, 2023

Conversation

tkashem
Copy link
Contributor

@tkashem tkashem commented Nov 4, 2022

cherry-pick of #1394 (manually done)

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 4, 2022

@tkashem: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

routes/status resources can leak sensitive data

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 4, 2022
@tkashem tkashem changed the title routes/status resources can leak sensitive data Bug 2073220: routes/status resources can leak sensitive data Nov 4, 2022
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Nov 4, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 4, 2022

@tkashem: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2073220, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.10.z" release, but it targets "4.12.0" instead
  • expected Bugzilla bug 2073220 to depend on a bug targeting a release in 4.11.0, 4.11.z and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 2073220: routes/status resources can leak sensitive data

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@tkashem tkashem changed the title Bug 2073220: routes/status resources can leak sensitive data [release-4.11] OCPBUGS-3293: routes/status resources can leak sensitive data Nov 4, 2022
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@tkashem: An error was encountered converting bugzilla URL https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-3290 to an ID for bug OCPBUGS-3293 on the Jira server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com. No known errors were detected, please see the full error message for details.

Full error message. strconv.Atoi: parsing "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-3290": invalid syntax

Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with /jira refresh.

In response to this:

cherry-pick of #1394 (manually done)

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Nov 4, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 4, 2022

@tkashem: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

[release-4.11] OCPBUGS-3293: routes/status resources can leak sensitive data

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@tkashem
Copy link
Contributor Author

tkashem commented Nov 4, 2022

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@tkashem: An error was encountered converting bugzilla URL https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-3290 to an ID for bug OCPBUGS-3293 on the Jira server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com. No known errors were detected, please see the full error message for details.

Full error message. strconv.Atoi: parsing "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-3290": invalid syntax

Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with /jira refresh.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@tkashem tkashem changed the title [release-4.11] OCPBUGS-3293: routes/status resources can leak sensitive data [release-4.10] OCPBUGS-3293: routes/status resources can leak sensitive data Nov 4, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 4, 2022

@tkashem: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

[release-4.10] OCPBUGS-3293: routes/status resources can leak sensitive data

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@tkashem tkashem changed the title [release-4.10] OCPBUGS-3293: routes/status resources can leak sensitive data [release-4.10] Bug 2073220: routes/status resources can leak sensitive data Nov 4, 2022
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. label Nov 4, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 4, 2022

@tkashem: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2073220, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.10.z" release, but it targets "4.12.0" instead
  • expected Bugzilla bug 2073220 to depend on a bug targeting a release in 4.11.0, 4.11.z and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

[release-4.10] Bug 2073220: routes/status resources can leak sensitive data

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Nov 4, 2022
@tkashem
Copy link
Contributor Author

tkashem commented Nov 4, 2022

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 4, 2022

@tkashem: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2073220, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.10.z" release, but it targets "4.12.0" instead
  • expected Bugzilla bug 2073220 to depend on a bug targeting a release in 4.11.0, 4.11.z and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@tkashem
Copy link
Contributor Author

tkashem commented Nov 4, 2022

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 4, 2022

@tkashem: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2073220, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.10.z" release, but it targets "4.12.0" instead
  • expected Bugzilla bug 2073220 to depend on a bug targeting a release in 4.11.0, 4.11.z and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@tkashem tkashem changed the title [release-4.10] Bug 2073220: routes/status resources can leak sensitive data [release-4.10] OCPBUGS-3293: routes/status resources can leak sensitive data Nov 4, 2022
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@tkashem: An error was encountered converting bugzilla URL https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-3290 to an ID for bug OCPBUGS-3293 on the Jira server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com. No known errors were detected, please see the full error message for details.

Full error message. strconv.Atoi: parsing "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-3290": invalid syntax

Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with /jira refresh.

In response to this:

cherry-pick of #1394 (manually done)

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. label Nov 4, 2022
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Nov 4, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 4, 2022

@tkashem: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

[release-4.10] OCPBUGS-3293: routes/status resources can leak sensitive data

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@tkashem
Copy link
Contributor Author

tkashem commented Nov 4, 2022

/jira reresh

@tkashem
Copy link
Contributor Author

tkashem commented Nov 4, 2022

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@tkashem: An error was encountered converting bugzilla URL https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-3290 to an ID for bug OCPBUGS-3293 on the Jira server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com. No known errors were detected, please see the full error message for details.

Full error message. strconv.Atoi: parsing "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-3290": invalid syntax

Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with /jira refresh.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@tkashem
Copy link
Contributor Author

tkashem commented Nov 4, 2022

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 4, 2022

@tkashem: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@tkashem tkashem changed the title [release-4.10] OCPBUGS-3293: routes/status resources can leak sensitive data [release-4.10] Bug 2073220: routes/status resources can leak sensitive data Nov 4, 2022
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Nov 4, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 4, 2022

@tkashem: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2073220, which is invalid:

  • expected Bugzilla bug 2073220 to depend on a bug targeting a release in 4.11.0, 4.11.z and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

[release-4.10] Bug 2073220: routes/status resources can leak sensitive data

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@tkashem
Copy link
Contributor Author

tkashem commented Nov 21, 2022

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 21, 2022

@tkashem: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2073220, which is invalid:

  • expected Bugzilla bug 2073220 to depend on a bug targeting a release in 4.11.0, 4.11.z and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@tkashem
Copy link
Contributor Author

tkashem commented Jan 4, 2023

/retitle [release-4.10] OCPBUGS-5345: routes/status resources can leak sensitive data

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title [release-4.10] Bug 2073220: routes/status resources can leak sensitive data [release-4.10] OCPBUGS-5345: routes/status resources can leak sensitive data Jan 4, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@tkashem: An error was encountered converting bugzilla URL https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-3293 to an ID for bug OCPBUGS-5345 on the Jira server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com. No known errors were detected, please see the full error message for details.

Full error message. strconv.Atoi: parsing "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-3293": invalid syntax

Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with /jira refresh.

In response to this:

cherry-pick of #1394 (manually done)

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jan 4, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 4, 2023

@tkashem: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

[release-4.10] OCPBUGS-5345: routes/status resources can leak sensitive data

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@tkashem
Copy link
Contributor Author

tkashem commented Jan 4, 2023

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@tkashem: An error was encountered converting bugzilla URL https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-3293 to an ID for bug OCPBUGS-5345 on the Jira server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com. No known errors were detected, please see the full error message for details.

Full error message. strconv.Atoi: parsing "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-3293": invalid syntax

Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with /jira refresh.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@dgrisonnet
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 4, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 4, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dgrisonnet, tkashem

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 4, 2023

@tkashem: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 2a49f94 into openshift:release-4.10 Jan 4, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@tkashem: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-5345 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

cherry-pick of #1394 (manually done)

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants