Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1946497: Updates the way lock acquisition throws an error #228

Merged

Conversation

huffmanca
Copy link
Contributor

Updates the way lock acquisition throws an error

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Apr 13, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@huffmanca: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1946497, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.8.0" release, but it targets "---" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

WIP: Bug 1946497: Updates the way lock acquisition throws an error

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Apr 13, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 13, 2021
@huffmanca
Copy link
Contributor Author

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Apr 13, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@huffmanca: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1946497, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.8.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.8.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Bugzilla (piqin@redhat.com), skipping review request.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@huffmanca huffmanca changed the title WIP: Bug 1946497: Updates the way lock acquisition throws an error Bug 1946497: Updates the way lock acquisition throws an error Apr 13, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Apr 13, 2021
return lock, false, []string{}, err
}
existingLinkPaths, err := GetMatchingSymlinksInDirs(device, symlinkDirs...)
if err != nil || len(existingLinkPaths) > 0 {
// If we don't have any existing symlinks AND we can't get a lock, throw an error
if err != nil || (len(existingLinkPaths) == 0 && !locked) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

But what is the error here then? if we couldn't get lock because device was busy and no existing symlinks were present then err variable will be nil.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've updated lock acquisition to return the error regardless of if the device is busy. This keeps the same logic, but populates the error if the device is busy (which isn't reported as long as there's one or more links).

Let me know your thoughts on this approach.

@huffmanca
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

if err != nil || len(existingLinkPaths) > 0 {
existingLinkPaths, symErr := GetMatchingSymlinksInDirs(device, symlinkDirs...)
// If symErr is not nil, there was an error fetching the symlinks
if symErr != nil {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Rather than returning hardcoded true or false values - should we just just return locked variable? There could be a case where device is locked but GetMatchingSymlinksInDirs erred out for different reason and in which case caller should not assume device did not get locked.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This has been updated so that we're returning locked instead of true or false.

@gnufied
Copy link
Member

gnufied commented Apr 21, 2021

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 21, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: gnufied, huffmanca

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit d4e54d6 into openshift:master Apr 21, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@huffmanca: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 1946497 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1946497: Updates the way lock acquisition throws an error

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants