Bug 1800423: Apply the reboot annotation to the machine

[beekhof]

Discussing with the metal3 folks, we’d like to watch the machine for the annotation instead if the node. This avoids the creation of a controller that just relays the annotation from the node to the machine.

[beekhof]

/assign @ingvagabund

[enxebre]

/approve

[openshift-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: enxebre

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• pkg/controller/machinehealthcheck/OWNERS [enxebre]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[beekhof]

Re-executed the tests, the failures do not appear related to this PR

[openshift-ci-robot]

@beekhof: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1800423, which is invalid:

• expected the bug to target the "4.4.0" release, but it targets "---" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 1800423: Apply the reboot annotation to the machine

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[beekhof]

/retest tide

[beekhof]

/bugzilla refresh

[openshift-ci-robot]

@beekhof: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1800423, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[beekhof]

/retest

[beekhof]

/cc @bison or @michaelgugino - could i trouble one of you for a review and lgtm please?
Test failures are not related to this code (mostly etcd failures)

[bison]

/lgtm

[openshift-bot]

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

[openshift-bot]

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

[openshift-bot]

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

[openshift-bot]

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

[openshift-bot]

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@beekhof: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged. Bugzilla bug 1800423 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1800423: Apply the reboot annotation to the machine

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@beekhof: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-azure-operator	1216944	link	/test e2e-azure-operator
ci/prow/e2e-azure	1216944	link	/test e2e-azure
ci/prow/e2e-aws-scaleup-rhel7	1216944	link	/test e2e-aws-scaleup-rhel7

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.