Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for optional provisioning networks on Baremetal platforms #632

Merged

Conversation

sadasu
Copy link
Contributor

@sadasu sadasu commented Jul 2, 2020

In addition to supporting fully managed provisioning networks with the
option of having external DHCP servers, baremetal installations should
also be able to support cases where a dedicated provisioning network
does not exist.
Details regarding the updates to the provisioning CR to accomodate the
above feature can be found in [1].
Also, removing support for the ConfigMap as way to pass provisioning
configuration to the MAO for baremetal installs.

[1] - https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/master/enhancements/baremetal/baremetal-provisioning-optional.md

@sadasu sadasu changed the title Add support for optional provisioning networks on Baremetal platforms [WIP]:Add support for optional provisioning networks on Baremetal platforms Jul 2, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jul 2, 2020
@sadasu sadasu changed the title [WIP]:Add support for optional provisioning networks on Baremetal platforms Add support for optional provisioning networks on Baremetal platforms Jul 27, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jul 27, 2020
@sadasu
Copy link
Contributor Author

sadasu commented Jul 28, 2020

/test e2e-metal-ipi

@sadasu
Copy link
Contributor Author

sadasu commented Jul 28, 2020

/test e2e-aws

@sadasu
Copy link
Contributor Author

sadasu commented Jul 28, 2020

/test e2e-azure-operator

@sadasu
Copy link
Contributor Author

sadasu commented Jul 28, 2020

/test e2e-aws-scaleup-rhel7

@sadasu
Copy link
Contributor Author

sadasu commented Jul 28, 2020

/test e2e-azure

@sadasu
Copy link
Contributor Author

sadasu commented Jul 28, 2020

/test e2e-gcp

@sadasu
Copy link
Contributor Author

sadasu commented Jul 28, 2020

/test e2e-gcp-operator

@stbenjam
Copy link
Member

From my side this looks good, I haven't tested it together with my PR yet, and I left one question about the enum.

Let's just make sure we don't merge until e2e-metal-ipi passes and the normal happy path still works. That will be failing until we get OVN fixed: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860710

/lgtm
/hold

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 28, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 28, 2020
@stbenjam
Copy link
Member

If the MAO team could approve and let us remove the hold when we're ready, that would be great.

@sadasu sadasu force-pushed the provisioning-optional branch 2 times, most recently from 1b4fb3c to 7d57ec7 Compare August 5, 2020 19:56
In addition to supporting fully managed provisioning networks with the
option of having external DHCP servers, baremetal installations should
also be able to support cases where a dedicated provisioning network
does not exist.
Details regarding the updates to the provisioning CR to accomodate the
above feature can be found in [1].
Also, removing support for the ConfigMap as way to pass provisioning
configuration to the MAO for baremetal installs.

[1] - https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/master/enhancements/baremetal/baremetal-provisioning-optional.md
Copy link
Contributor

@michaelgugino michaelgugino left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 5, 2020
@sadasu
Copy link
Contributor Author

sadasu commented Aug 5, 2020

/retest

@stbenjam
Copy link
Member

stbenjam commented Aug 6, 2020

/test e2e-metal-ipi

1 similar comment
@sadasu
Copy link
Contributor Author

sadasu commented Aug 6, 2020

/test e2e-metal-ipi

Copy link
Contributor

@elmiko elmiko left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: elmiko

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 6, 2020
@stbenjam
Copy link
Member

stbenjam commented Aug 6, 2020

/hold

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 6, 2020
@stbenjam
Copy link
Member

stbenjam commented Aug 6, 2020

e2e-metal-ipi is not a blocking job, but we need it to pass. Please remove the hold once e2e-metal-ipi passes. CI is currently flaky, but unrelated to this PR.

@stbenjam
Copy link
Member

stbenjam commented Aug 6, 2020

/test e2e-metal-ipi

@elmiko
Copy link
Contributor

elmiko commented Aug 6, 2020

ack, thanks for the update @stbenjam

@sadasu
Copy link
Contributor Author

sadasu commented Aug 6, 2020

/test e2e-aws-operator

@sadasu
Copy link
Contributor Author

sadasu commented Aug 6, 2020

/test e2e-metal-ipi

1 similar comment
@sadasu
Copy link
Contributor Author

sadasu commented Aug 6, 2020

/test e2e-metal-ipi

@sadasu
Copy link
Contributor Author

sadasu commented Aug 6, 2020

/test e2e-aws-upgrade

@sadasu
Copy link
Contributor Author

sadasu commented Aug 6, 2020

/test e2e-metal-ipi

4 similar comments
@stbenjam
Copy link
Member

stbenjam commented Aug 7, 2020

/test e2e-metal-ipi

@sadasu
Copy link
Contributor Author

sadasu commented Aug 7, 2020

/test e2e-metal-ipi

@hardys
Copy link

hardys commented Aug 7, 2020

/test e2e-metal-ipi

@stbenjam
Copy link
Member

/test e2e-metal-ipi

@stbenjam
Copy link
Member

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 10, 2020
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 3c2caf2 into openshift:master Aug 10, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

10 participants