New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bug 1880787: Remove changes required to deploy metal3 pods from MAO #767
Bug 1880787: Remove changes required to deploy metal3 pods from MAO #767
Conversation
6bf3486
to
ec90a30
Compare
/test e2e-aws |
/test e2e-metal-ipi |
/retest |
What do you think about removing the RelatedObjects from status.go and status_test.go? machine-api-operator/pkg/operator/status.go Lines 203 to 207 in 71aeab4
machine-api-operator/pkg/operator/status_test.go Lines 241 to 246 in 71aeab4
|
/retitle Bug 1903275: Remove changes required to deploy metal3 pods from MAO |
@sadasu: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1903275, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Let's use this PR as the fix for the CRD conflict between CBO and MAO. /bugzilla refresh |
@stbenjam: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1903275, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
ec90a30
to
06283c2
Compare
@stbenjam I am not sure if we need that because capbm refers to the baremetalhost CR. I could try to make that change and test. |
cluster-baremetal-operator will take care of managing these resources.
06283c2
to
c49ca7f
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
Oh I see, that makes sense, it probably should stay as a related object then. |
/test e2e-aws |
/lgtm @michaelgugino Would you be able to approve or do we need to get someone else? Thanks! |
/retest |
@sadasu: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1880787, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: JoelSpeed The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
Previous e2e-aws-operator job:
before getting hung up in a slow gather-extra step. If this is blocking promotions, maybe we should |
/bugzilla refresh to pick up the urgent tag. |
@wking: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1880787, which is valid. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
e2e-aws-operator failed install with |
Overriding it sounds fine to us, we'll need an approver in MAO to actually do it: Maybe @JoelSpeed or @michaelgugino? |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
3 similar comments
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
Most recent e2e-aws-operator failure is:
But both install and gather-extra worked fine this time 😆 |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
1 similar comment
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
@sadasu: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Bugzilla bug 1880787 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
cluster-baremetal-operator will take care of managing these
resources.