Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[release-4.7] [OCPCLOUD-1222] Bug 1993118: Make sure nodes don't have attached volumes before vm deletion #904

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 15, 2021
Merged

[release-4.7] [OCPCLOUD-1222] Bug 1993118: Make sure nodes don't have attached volumes before vm deletion #904

merged 1 commit into from Oct 15, 2021

Conversation

openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link

This is an automated cherry-pick of #894

/assign Fedosin

@Fedosin
Bug 1990432: Make sure nodes don't have attached volumes before vm de…
fe83604 
…letion

This commit checks if the node has some attached volumes before
deleting its vm. If there are any, it doesn't allow to delete the
vm and returns an error.
@openshift-cherrypick-robot openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Aug 12, 2021
Merged
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 12, 2021

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Bugzilla bug 1990432 has been cloned as Bugzilla bug 1993118. Retitling PR to link against new bug.
/retitle [release-4.7] [OCPCLOUD-1222] Bug 1993118: Make sure nodes don't have attached volumes before vm deletion

In response to this:

[release-4.7] [OCPCLOUD-1222] Bug 1990432: Make sure nodes don't have attached volumes before vm deletion

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title [release-4.7] [OCPCLOUD-1222] Bug 1990432: Make sure nodes don't have attached volumes before vm deletion [release-4.7] [OCPCLOUD-1222] Bug 1993118: Make sure nodes don't have attached volumes before vm deletion Aug 12, 2021
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Aug 12, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 12, 2021

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1993118, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1990432 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is POST instead
  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1990432 to target a release in 4.8.0, 4.8.z, but it targets "4.9.0" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

[release-4.7] [OCPCLOUD-1222] Bug 1993118: Make sure nodes don't have attached volumes before vm deletion

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from elmiko and enxebre August 12, 2021 12:23
@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 16, 2021

@JoelSpeed: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1993118, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1990432 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead
  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1993117 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is POST instead
  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1990432 to target a release in 4.8.0, 4.8.z, but it targets "4.9.0" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 16, 2021

@JoelSpeed: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1993118, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1993117 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is POST instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor

/approve
/lgtm
/retest

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 19, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 19, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: JoelSpeed

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 19, 2021
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

3 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 19, 2021 •
edited

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-operator fe83604 link /test e2e-gcp-operator

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 20, 2021

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1993118, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1993117 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is POST instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

3 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

24 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor

/skip

@sdodson
Copy link
Member

sdodson commented Oct 15, 2021

[patch-manager] 🚀 Approved for z-stream by score: 0.50

--skip-comment

@sdodson sdodson added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Oct 15, 2021
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 0307526 into openshift:release-4.7 Oct 15, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 15, 2021

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 1993118 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

[release-4.7] [OCPCLOUD-1222] Bug 1993118: Make sure nodes don't have attached volumes before vm deletion

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@elmiko elmiko Awaiting requested review from elmiko

@enxebre enxebre Awaiting requested review from enxebre

@miyadav miyadav Awaiting requested review from miyadav

Assignees

@JoelSpeed JoelSpeed

@Fedosin Fedosin

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
6 participants
@openshift-cherrypick-robot @JoelSpeed @openshift-bot @Fedosin @sdodson @openshift-merge-robot