New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OCPBUGS-30855: Ensure portSecurity is correctly set in the Port #107
OCPBUGS-30855: Ensure portSecurity is correctly set in the Port #107
Conversation
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: MaysaMacedo The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Right now we only enforce portSecurity when it's defined within the Machine's Network field, but the portSecurity in the Machine's ports field should also be enforced. This commit fixes the issue by ensuring the value of PortSecurity is correctly set in the Server port.
687cd90
to
555ef8d
Compare
/cc @mandre |
@MaysaMacedo: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
this worked, thanks |
/cherry-pick release-4.15 |
@EmilienM: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-4.15 in a new PR and assign it to you. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/retitle OCPBUGS-30855: Ensure portSecurity is correctly set in the Port |
@MaysaMacedo: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-30855, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
@EmilienM: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-30855, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/jira refresh |
@EmilienM: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-30855, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (itbrown@redhat.com), skipping review request. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
@MaysaMacedo: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-30855: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-30855 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
@EmilienM: new pull request created: #108 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@EmilienM: #107 failed to apply on top of branch "release-4.14":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@EmilienM: #107 failed to apply on top of branch "release-4.13":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@EmilienM: #107 failed to apply on top of branch "release-4.12":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
We'll need to backport this one down to 4.12 I believe? |
[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER] This PR has been included in build ose-machine-api-provider-openstack-container-v4.16.0-202403141746.p0.gbf45c1f.assembly.stream.el9 for distgit ose-machine-api-provider-openstack. |
Fix included in accepted release 4.16.0-0.nightly-2024-03-21-152650 |
Right now we only enforce portSecurity when it's defined
within the Machine's Network field, but the portSecurity
in the Machine's ports field should also be enforced.
This commit fixes the issue by ensuring the value of
PortSecurity is correctly set in the Server port.