Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1738831: pkg/controller/node: resync all pools for a node #1049

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Aug 8, 2019

Conversation

runcom
Copy link
Member

@runcom runcom commented Aug 8, 2019

When a node belongs to more than one pool, we need to trigger a resync
for all the pools it belongs to or we leave the "parent" MCP at an old
state. The easy example would be to create an infra pool of just 1
node and describe the worker mcp and notice that it still has all nodes
(including the now-infra node).

Signed-off-by: Antonio Murdaca runcom@linux.com

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Aug 8, 2019
@runcom runcom changed the title pkg/controller/node: resync all pools for a node Bug 1738831: pkg/controller/node: resync all pools for a node Aug 8, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@runcom: This pull request references a valid Bugzilla bug. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

Bug 1738831: pkg/controller/node: resync all pools for a node

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Aug 8, 2019
@runcom
Copy link
Member Author

runcom commented Aug 8, 2019

/hold

works but there's a gotcha exposed from unit tests

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 8, 2019
When a node belongs to more than one pool, we need to trigger a resync
for all the pools it belongs to or we leave the "parent" MCP at an old
state. The easy example would be to create an infra pool of just 1
node and describe the worker mcp and notice that it still has all nodes
(including the now-infra node).

Signed-off-by: Antonio Murdaca <runcom@linux.com>
@runcom
Copy link
Member Author

runcom commented Aug 8, 2019

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 8, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Aug 8, 2019
@cgwalters
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 8, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: cgwalters, runcom

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 1759c35 into openshift:master Aug 8, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@runcom: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged. The Bugzilla bug has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1738831: pkg/controller/node: resync all pools for a node

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@runcom runcom deleted the mcc-resync branch August 8, 2019 20:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants