Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1777082: set vsphere as provider #1291

Merged

Conversation

ericavonb
Copy link
Contributor

@ericavonb ericavonb commented Nov 26, 2019

fix(pkg/controller/template/render): set vsphere as provider

Set cloudProvider to VSphere in the kubelet configs.
Fixes Bug 1777082: volume cannot mount to node after upgrade

Bug 1776773: volume cannot mount to node after upgrade

Set cloudProvider to VSphere in the kubelet configs.
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Nov 26, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@ericavonb: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1776773, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.4.0" release, but it targets "4.3.0" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 1776773: set vsphere as provider

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Nov 26, 2019
@kikisdeliveryservice
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@kikisdeliveryservice: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1776773, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.4.0" release, but it targets "4.3.0" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@kikisdeliveryservice kikisdeliveryservice requested review from gnufied and kikisdeliveryservice and removed request for ashcrow and cgwalters November 26, 2019 21:46
@abhinavdahiya
Copy link
Contributor

abhinavdahiya commented Nov 26, 2019

would be nice to see/test if vsphere is also setting the cloud-provider-config ?
https://github.com/openshift/machine-config-operator/pull/1291/files#diff-46149d064bd665c5078bfe4f1c38ae86R73-R96

@kikisdeliveryservice
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@kikisdeliveryservice: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1776773, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.4.0" release, but it targets "4.3.0" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@kikisdeliveryservice kikisdeliveryservice changed the title Bug 1776773: set vsphere as provider Bug 1777082: set vsphere as provider Nov 26, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@ericavonb: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1777082, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.4.0" release, but it targets "4.3.0" instead
  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1776773 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is NEW instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 1777082: set vsphere as provider

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

1 similar comment
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@ericavonb: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1777082, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.4.0" release, but it targets "4.3.0" instead
  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1776773 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is NEW instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 1777082: set vsphere as provider

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@kikisdeliveryservice
Copy link
Contributor

ok, made a 4.4 bz so we can backport..

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@kikisdeliveryservice: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1777082, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.4.0" release, but it targets "4.3.0" instead
  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1776773 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is NEW instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

ok, made a 4.4 bz so we can backport..

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@kikisdeliveryservice
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

@jcpowermac
Copy link
Contributor

jcpowermac commented Nov 26, 2019

We really need a e2e-vsphere job for mco. I was starting to make changes unless someone else wants to.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@kikisdeliveryservice: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1777082, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1776773 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is NEW instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@ericavonb
Copy link
Contributor Author

/rename Bug 1777082: set vsphere as provider

@ericavonb
Copy link
Contributor Author

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Nov 26, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@ericavonb: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1777082, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Nov 26, 2019
@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@ericavonb: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-4.3 in a new PR and assign it to you.

In response to this:

/cherrypick release-4.3

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@kikisdeliveryservice
Copy link
Contributor

spoke to @jcpowermac and he's going to add a e2e-vsphere test like we have for openstack: https://github.com/openshift/release/blob/master/ci-operator/jobs/openshift/machine-config-operator/openshift-machine-config-operator-master-presubmits.yaml#L362

once that gets done we'll test that way before merging.

/hold

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Nov 26, 2019
@kikisdeliveryservice
Copy link
Contributor

FYI: RHEL7 scaleup test failing across PRs due to BZ1777034 (unrelated to this PR and MCO), seeing same err:
"Error: Package: cri-o-1.16.0-0.2.dev.rhaos4.3.gita1639b5.el8.x86_64 (openshift-rpms)

@ericavonb
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-vsphere

@kikisdeliveryservice
Copy link
Contributor

/skip e2e-aws-scaleup-rhel7

@kikisdeliveryservice
Copy link
Contributor

/skip

@kikisdeliveryservice
Copy link
Contributor

Might need the inflight openshift/release#6131 to merge to have enough clusters for e2e-vsphere to run.

@kikisdeliveryservice
Copy link
Contributor

Going to remove the hold so that this can be merged/LGTM'ed by @jcpowermac / @gnufied as they see fit based on the results of e2e-vsphere runs.

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Nov 27, 2019
@gnufied
Copy link
Member

gnufied commented Nov 27, 2019

it mostly looks good to me. Although - I do not understand MCO code well enough. :-)

@ericavonb
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-vsphere

@jcpowermac
Copy link
Contributor

@ericavonb the statefulset and PVC tests that were failing succeeded. I think this PR is good to go.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 28, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ericavonb, jcpowermac, kikisdeliveryservice

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [ericavonb,kikisdeliveryservice]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

8 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@ericavonb: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun them all:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-scaleup-rhel7 3f3cf8e link /test e2e-aws-scaleup-rhel7
ci/prow/e2e-vsphere 3f3cf8e link /test e2e-vsphere

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 37b2a19 into openshift:master Nov 28, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@ericavonb: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged. Bugzilla bug 1777082 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1777082: set vsphere as provider

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@ericavonb: new pull request created: #1293

In response to this:

/cherrypick release-4.3

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

9 participants