Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1777837: BAREMETAL- decrease infra pods resources #1295

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Dec 4, 2019
Merged

Bug 1777837: BAREMETAL- decrease infra pods resources #1295

merged 1 commit into from Dec 4, 2019

Conversation

yboaron
Copy link
Contributor

@yboaron yboaron commented Nov 28, 2019

All infra pods have "requests" section with 1Gb of RAM and 150m of CPU,
but they do not consume more than 200mb and 100m respectively.
This leads to irrational use of resources and prevents the launch of
workloads on workers.
Fixes Bug 1777837 : [IPI][Baremetal] Infra pods consume too much resources

- What I did

- How to verify it

- Description for the changelog

All infra pods have "requests" section with 1Gb of RAM and 150m of CPU,
but they do not consume more than 200mb and 100m respectively.
This leads to irrational use of resources and prevents the launch of
workloads on workers.
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@yboaron: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1777837, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.4.0" release, but it targets "---" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 1777837: BAREMETAL- decrease infra pods resources

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 28, 2019
@runcom
Copy link
Member

runcom commented Nov 28, 2019

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@runcom: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1777837, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Nov 28, 2019
@yboaron
Copy link
Contributor Author

yboaron commented Dec 1, 2019

/cc @celebdor

@yboaron
Copy link
Contributor Author

yboaron commented Dec 1, 2019

/cc @bcrochet

@celebdor
Copy link
Contributor

celebdor commented Dec 2, 2019

/approve

@bcrochet
Copy link
Member

bcrochet commented Dec 2, 2019

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 2, 2019
@bcrochet
Copy link
Member

bcrochet commented Dec 2, 2019

/retest

@kikisdeliveryservice kikisdeliveryservice removed the request for review from LorbusChris December 2, 2019 18:14
@kikisdeliveryservice
Copy link
Contributor

/skip

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bcrochet, celebdor, kikisdeliveryservice, yboaron

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [kikisdeliveryservice]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 2, 2019
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

5 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

2 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@yboaron
Copy link
Contributor Author

yboaron commented Dec 3, 2019

/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

10 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@kikisdeliveryservice
Copy link
Contributor

/test e2e-aws

1 similar comment
@kikisdeliveryservice
Copy link
Contributor

/test e2e-aws

@kikisdeliveryservice
Copy link
Contributor

/test e2e-gcp-op

@kikisdeliveryservice
Copy link
Contributor

/test e2e-aws

@kikisdeliveryservice
Copy link
Contributor

/test e2e-gcp-op

1 similar comment
@kikisdeliveryservice
Copy link
Contributor

/test e2e-gcp-op

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

4 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 4, 2019

@yboaron: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun them all:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-scaleup-rhel7 97e7046 link /test e2e-aws-scaleup-rhel7

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 6c6537a into openshift:master Dec 4, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@yboaron: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged. Bugzilla bug 1777837 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1777837: BAREMETAL- decrease infra pods resources

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

9 participants