Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

daemon: Move "Validated on-disk state" log to only when we have #1416

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jun 23, 2020

Conversation

cgwalters
Copy link
Member

When the force file is present, we didn't actually validate.
Obviously, this just changes logging; I was just reading the code
as part of looking at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1766515

When the force file is present, we didn't actually validate.
Obviously, this just changes logging; I was just reading the code
as part of looking at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1766515
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Jan 28, 2020
@runcom
Copy link
Member

runcom commented Jan 28, 2020

/approve

This should be safe to merge now but let me get back with a more concrete action on what to do here (branch isn't frozen, but we'd need a bug fix for such a change as well perhaps)

@kikisdeliveryservice
Copy link
Contributor

/approve

This should be safe to merge now but let me get back with a more concrete action on what to do here (branch isn't frozen, but we'd need a bug fix for such a change as well perhaps)

gonna add a hold bc this prob needs a bz

/hold

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 28, 2020
@kikisdeliveryservice
Copy link
Contributor

unless you wanted to make it part of 1766515?

@runcom
Copy link
Member

runcom commented Jan 29, 2020

/skip

@runcom
Copy link
Member

runcom commented Jan 29, 2020

(after some chats...) PR is super tiny so it can go in as it's not really requiring a BZ

/hold cancel
/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 29, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 29, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ashcrow, cgwalters, runcom

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [ashcrow,cgwalters,runcom]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

2 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@runcom
Copy link
Member

runcom commented Jan 30, 2020

Uhm probably need a BZ now that master has been enforced , let’s see

/refresh

@runcom
Copy link
Member

runcom commented Jan 31, 2020

/hold

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 31, 2020
@kikisdeliveryservice
Copy link
Contributor

ok this can finally merge, im doing it.

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 23, 2020
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

2 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Jun 23, 2020

@cgwalters: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-scaleup-rhel7 f48ba61 link /test e2e-aws-scaleup-rhel7

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 85972a9 into openshift:master Jun 23, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants