New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bug 1820822: sdn: ignore new ovn-kubernetes OVS internal port names ovn-k8s-gw0 and ovn-k8s-mp0 #1614
Bug 1820822: sdn: ignore new ovn-kubernetes OVS internal port names ovn-k8s-gw0 and ovn-k8s-mp0 #1614
Conversation
/lgtm |
@dcbw: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1820822, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@dcbw: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1820823, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@dcbw: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1820822, which is valid. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Revert this when openshift/machine-config-operator#1614 merges.
/approve |
/refresh |
/skip |
/lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: cgwalters, dcbw, runcom, trozet The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/retest |
Yeah, that's a larger conversation and it's been discussed upstream in the kernel periodically. But AFAIK we don't have that kind of "owner" tag for interfaces yet. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
1 similar comment
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
@dcbw: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
1 similar comment
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
@dcbw: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: openshift/machine-config-operator#1614. Bugzilla bug 1820822 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Revert this when openshift/machine-config-operator#1614 merges.
To prevent racing with NetworkManager's OVS plugin resulting in IP addresses sometimes being cleared from the OVS internal ports that openshift-sdn and ovn-kubernetes set up, we must tell NM to ignore those ports.
@trozet @danwinship @squeed @openshift/networking