Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release-4.5] Bug 1846503: Sync kublelet config across platforms #1835

Conversation

openshift-cherrypick-robot

This is an automated cherry-pick of #1817

/assign russellb

This came up because of a bug report showing that workloads were
scheduled on masters for the baremetal platform regardless of the
schedulableMasters scheduler configuration.  This is due to the
NoSchedule taint not being applied by default on this platform.  The
baremetal platform specific kubelet caused this behavior.  We were
going to remove the custom kubelet config once this behavior was
configurable (see PR openshift#993), but it was never removed because we ended
up needing to make some IPv6 related customizations in this file.  We
also forgot to re-add the default taint.

Meanwhile, some other changes to the kubelet unit were not applied to
the baremetal version.  I also checked the openstack and vsphere files
and found discrepencies there, as well.

This is the simplest fix, which is to get these files in sync again.
The differences are very minor, so a better follow-up would be to get
back to a single kubelet unit, or at least share the duplicated
content somehow.

I'm leaving that further cleanup as another change, since the most
straight forward fix will be the simpler one to backport.

Fixes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1828250
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Detected clone of Bugzilla bug 1828250 with correct target release. Retitling PR to link to clone:
/retitle [release-4.5] Bug 1846503: Sync kublelet config across platforms

In response to this:

[release-4.5] Bug 1828250: Sync kublelet config across platforms

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot changed the title [release-4.5] Bug 1828250: Sync kublelet config across platforms [release-4.5] Bug 1846503: Sync kublelet config across platforms Jun 16, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jun 16, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1846503, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.5.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.5.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
  • dependent bug Bugzilla bug 1828250 is in the state MODIFIED, which is one of the valid states (MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED)
  • dependent Bugzilla bug 1828250 targets the "4.6.0" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.6.0, 4.6.z
  • bug has dependents

In response to this:

[release-4.5] Bug 1846503: Sync kublelet config across platforms

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@russellb
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

/cc @runcom

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 17, 2020
@runcom
Copy link
Member

runcom commented Jun 17, 2020

/approve
/assign @ashcrow

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: openshift-cherrypick-robot, runcom, russellb

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 17, 2020
@runcom
Copy link
Member

runcom commented Jun 17, 2020

/retest

@ashcrow ashcrow added the staff-eng-approved Indicates a release branch PR has been approved by a staff engineer (formerly group/pillar lead). label Jun 17, 2020
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit e9c97e5 into openshift:release-4.5 Jun 17, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: openshift/machine-config-operator#1835. Bugzilla bug 1846503 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

[release-4.5] Bug 1846503: Sync kublelet config across platforms

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. staff-eng-approved Indicates a release branch PR has been approved by a staff engineer (formerly group/pillar lead).
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants