Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "Bug 1888565: daemon: Explicitly start rpm-ostreed" #2296

Conversation

YuviGold
Copy link
Contributor

Reverts #2291

assisted-installer is running MCD inside custom podman container as once from[1].
Reverting this PR until better consider once from usage.

/cc @cgwalters

[1] https://github.com/openshift/assisted-installer/blob/e3c999d9f16f8c8e9fa6d4105591da33ad84fc62/src/installer/installer.go#L218-L224

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Dec 14, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@YuviGold: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1888565, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Revert "Bug 1888565: daemon: Explicitly start rpm-ostreed"

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@sinnykumari
Copy link
Contributor

I haven't tried myself once-from usecase. My understanding was that m-c-d onceFrom is mainly there to run partial functionality of MCO on non-coreOS system like RHEL.
To help understand can you please tell what exact failure you are seeing caused by #2291?

@YuviGold
Copy link
Contributor Author

I haven't tried myself once-from usecase. My understanding was that m-c-d onceFrom is mainly there to run partial functionality of MCO on non-coreOS system like RHEL.
To help understand can you please tell what exact failure you are seeing caused by #2291?

Failed to initialize single run daemon: failed to start rpm-ostreed: error running systemctl start rpm-ostreed: Failed to connect to bus: No data available

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@YuviGold: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1888565, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is MODIFIED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

I haven't tried myself once-from usecase. My understanding was that m-c-d onceFrom is mainly there to run partial functionality of MCO on non-coreOS system like RHEL.
To help understand can you please tell what exact failure you are seeing caused by #2291?

Failed to initialize single run daemon: failed to start rpm-ostreed: error running systemctl start rpm-ostreed: Failed to connect to bus: No data available

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@yevgeny-shnaidman
Copy link

I haven't tried myself once-from usecase. My understanding was that m-c-d onceFrom is mainly there to run partial functionality of MCO on non-coreOS system like RHEL.
To help understand can you please tell what exact failure you are seeing caused by #2291?

Since in our case the bootstrap node is booted up using RHCOS LiveCD and we fetch the bootstrap.ign file afterwards, we use mco with once-from flag to parse the bootstrap.ign and install bootstrap.ign, and then run bootkube.sh code

@YuviGold
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest
/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Dec 14, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@YuviGold: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1888565, which is valid. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.7.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.7.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to this:

/retest
/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Dec 14, 2020
@cgwalters
Copy link
Member

Yeah I asked them to revert this; we really need a CI context on here that tests once-from.
/approve
/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 14, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: cgwalters, YuviGold

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 14, 2020
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@cgwalters
Copy link
Member

Here's a PR to add another optional test context to this repo: openshift/release#14300
Sinny do you want to lgtm?

@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-merge-robot commented Dec 14, 2020

@YuviGold: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/okd-e2e-aws 2ffb442 link /test okd-e2e-aws

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 77d5616 into openshift:master Dec 14, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@YuviGold: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 1888565 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Revert "Bug 1888565: daemon: Explicitly start rpm-ostreed"

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants