New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bug 1986757: Set timeoutSeconds for keepalived liveness probe #2703
Bug 1986757: Set timeoutSeconds for keepalived liveness probe #2703
Conversation
timeoutSeconds defaults to 1 second, but our liveness probe attempts to wait for 5 seconds. This seems to be causing frequent liveness probe timeouts in some environments which triggers unnecessary restarts. This patch sets timeoutSeconds to 5 to match the expectations of the probe.
@cybertron: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1986757, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Bugzilla (vvoronko@redhat.com), skipping review request. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/test e2e-ovirt |
/lgtm |
/retest |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/retest |
3 similar comments
/retest |
/retest |
/retest |
/test e2e-metal-ipi |
All of the affected platforms are now passing. This is a pretty simple change that isn't platform-specific so I think it could probably go in (although it would be even better if someone from the remaining two platforms could chime in). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Adding an approval and also a hold to be removed by @cybertron once he feels it's ready and has necessary approvals.
/hold
/lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: cybertron, Gal-Zaidman, kikisdeliveryservice, mandre, yboaron The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/retest |
/test e2e-agnostic-upgrade |
1 similar comment
/test e2e-agnostic-upgrade |
The failing jobs all appear to be permafails and none of them even deploy the changed template. I think we just need to skip them. |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
14 similar comments
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
@cybertron: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
4 similar comments
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
@cybertron: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Bugzilla bug 1986757 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/cherry-pick release-4.8 |
@yboaron: new pull request created: #2741 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
timeoutSeconds defaults to 1 second, but our liveness probe attempts
to wait for 5 seconds. This seems to be causing frequent liveness
probe timeouts in some environments which triggers unnecessary
restarts.
This patch sets timeoutSeconds to 5 to match the expectations of
the probe.
- Description for the changelog
Fixed an issue with the keepalived liveness probe that could cause spurious timeouts.