New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Vendor: update library-go for ibmcloud provider #2757
Vendor: update library-go for ibmcloud provider #2757
Conversation
This PR is also updating some of the kubernetes deps to 1.22.1. Can you please also update rest of the kube deps to 1.22.1 as well? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks Bryan. No further comments beyond what was already provided.
32d237c
to
06e1192
Compare
k8s.io/kubernetes => k8s.io/kubernetes v1.22.0-rc.0 | ||
k8s.io/legacy-cloud-providers => k8s.io/legacy-cloud-providers v0.22.0-rc.0 | ||
k8s.io/metrics => k8s.io/metrics v0.22.0-rc.0 | ||
k8s.io/mount-utils => k8s.io/mount-utils v0.23.0-alpha.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@umohnani8 Do we need to keep this version or we can keep it consistent with rest of the replace for kube deps i.e v0.22.1
06e1192
to
9ab849e
Compare
Latest change mostly looks good. One question: |
9ab849e
to
3875c26
Compare
3875c26
to
718c552
Compare
/retest-required |
Please fix some final comments from @rtheis and then this should be good to get merged |
/assign @kikisdeliveryservice |
@sinnykumari can you add required label(s)... |
There are few outstanding comment that needs to get fixed merge #2757 (comment) and #2757 (comment) |
Pull in support for ibmcloud added in openshift/library-go#1161
718c552
to
95ad345
Compare
/lgtm Thanks @jonesbr17 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the PR and doing the final fixes. lgtm
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
Skipping optional tests to save some ci resources. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
@rtheis: changing LGTM is restricted to collaborators In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: JoelSpeed, jonesbr17, rtheis, sinnykumari The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/retest-required |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
@jonesbr17: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/test e2e-agnostic-upgrade |
- What I did
Revendor dependencies
- How to verify it
- Description for the changelog
Pull in support for ibmcloud added in openshift/library-go#1161