Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Drop os_version label on nodes #657

Merged

Conversation

cgwalters
Copy link
Member

It isn't useful today because most containers just want the RHEL major
which they can't get at without parsing it, and you can't do that
in a selector.

Also, it turns out that the label commandline is a one-shot. We
need to move any label version updates into the MCD.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Apr 23, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 23, 2019
@cgwalters
Copy link
Member Author

Supercedes #584

@cgwalters
Copy link
Member Author

/test images

@kikisdeliveryservice
Copy link
Contributor

can this go into 4.1 then if it's not required?

@kikisdeliveryservice
Copy link
Contributor

to be held for 4.2
/hold

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 23, 2019
@cgwalters
Copy link
Member Author

/test e2e-aws-scaleup

It isn't useful today because most containers just want the RHEL major
which they can't get at without parsing it, and you can't do that
in a selector.

Also, it turns out that the label commandline is a one-shot.  We
need to move any label version updates into the MCD.
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels May 14, 2019
@cgwalters
Copy link
Member Author

Rebased 🏄‍♂️
/hold cancel
The next step is to move this fully into the MCD, but we might as well do this first.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label May 14, 2019
@runcom
Copy link
Member

runcom commented May 14, 2019

/approve
/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 14, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: cgwalters, runcom

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants