Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

We need use the ubi minimal image, since micro does not has root CA #142

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 4, 2022

Conversation

wanghaoran1988
Copy link
Member

Because the micro image doesn't has root CA files, I see the following errors on stg env:

{"level":"error","ts":1646361657.3095574,"logger":"controller.velero-controller","msg":"Reconciler error","name":"cluster","namespace":"openshift-velero","error":"RequestError: send request failed\ncaused by: Get \"https://s3.amazonaws.com/\": x509: certificate signed by unknown authority","stacktrace":"sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/internal/controller.(*Controller).Start.func2.2\n\tpkg/mod/sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime@v0.10.2/pkg/internal/controller/controller.go:227"}

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 4, 2022

@wanghaoran1988: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 4, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #142 (fb89c35) into master (1fa33ab) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #142   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   14.34%   14.34%           
=======================================
  Files          18       18           
  Lines        1115     1115           
=======================================
  Hits          160      160           
  Misses        942      942           
  Partials       13       13           

@cblecker
Copy link
Member

cblecker commented Mar 4, 2022

/lgtm
/approve

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 4, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 4, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: cblecker, wanghaoran1988

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 4, 2022
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 4c48973 into openshift:master Mar 4, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
3 participants