New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bug 1936539: Update zeroconf to pull in rate-limiting fix #27
Bug 1936539: Update zeroconf to pull in rate-limiting fix #27
Conversation
Vendor the latest zeroconf that includes better rate-limiting to avoid saturating the network with multicast traffic.
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Bugzilla bug 1898097 has been cloned as Bugzilla bug 1936539. Retitling PR to link against new bug. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1936539, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. 6 validation(s) were run on this bug
No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Bugzilla (osher@redhat.com), skipping review request. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/test e2e-openstack I'm not sure we have all of the platform jobs configured against this repo, but for everyone's awareness we had a request to backport this fix. |
@cybertron: The specified target(s) for
Use In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yep, no problem merging this from my side. Looks like the job passed for BM and I don't think this has the potential of breaking other platforms.
All good on my side as well, thanks for the update |
/lgtm |
/lgtm |
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: bcrochet, celebdor, openshift-cherrypick-robot The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Bugzilla bug 1936539 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
This is an automated cherry-pick of #21
/assign cybertron