Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

USHIFT-907: Remove unsupported topolvm manifests #1397

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 7, 2023

Conversation

copejon
Copy link
Contributor

@copejon copejon commented Feb 21, 2023

Which issue(s) this PR addresses:

This change removes files that contain the rbac / scc configuration for topolvm workloads (resizer, snapshotter) that are not shipped on MicroShift by default. As such, they don't enable or impede existing MicroShift components. Removing them is simply a housecleaning task.

Closes #USHIFT-907

@copejon
Copy link
Contributor Author

copejon commented Feb 21, 2023

/pj-rehearse ack
/pj-rehearse

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 21, 2023
@copejon
Copy link
Contributor Author

copejon commented Feb 21, 2023

/pj-rehearse

@copejon
Copy link
Contributor Author

copejon commented Feb 21, 2023

/pj-rehearse ack

@copejon
Copy link
Contributor Author

copejon commented Feb 21, 2023

/pj-rehearse

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Feb 21, 2023
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Feb 21, 2023
@copejon
Copy link
Contributor Author

copejon commented Feb 21, 2023

/retest-required

@ggiguash
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

2 similar comments
@ggiguash
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

@copejon
Copy link
Contributor Author

copejon commented Feb 22, 2023

/retest

@dhellmann
Copy link
Contributor

Could you add a little detail to the description and/or commit message explaining why we don't want these files?

There are 7 commits in the PR. Are the all independent, or can they be squashed into fewer?

@copejon
Copy link
Contributor Author

copejon commented Feb 23, 2023

Hey @dhellmann, np. I've updated the description.

@dhellmann
Copy link
Contributor

This looks OK, but it seems like there are some unrelated changes included. 117d611 seems to revert 89113f6, so maybe we can remove both of those commits to keep the history clean?

@dhellmann dhellmann added the kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. label Feb 27, 2023
@dhellmann
Copy link
Contributor

@pmtk or @pacevedom , we could set the merge method to squash this as it lands, if we want to get it in this week. What do you think?

@dhellmann dhellmann changed the title Remove unsupported topolvm manifests USHIFT-907: Remove unsupported topolvm manifests Feb 27, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 27, 2023

@copejon: This pull request references USHIFT-907 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Which issue(s) this PR addresses:

This change removes files that contain the rbac / scc configuration for topolvm workloads (resizer, snapshotter) that are not shipped on MicroShift by default. As such, they don't enable or impede existing MicroShift components. Removing them is simply a housecleaning task.

Closes #USHIFT-907

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Feb 27, 2023
@copejon copejon force-pushed the ushift-907 branch 2 times, most recently from 3e11cd3 to b2913b5 Compare March 7, 2023 18:16
remove resizer manifests from storage starter

testing kuttl timeout values, may be too aggressive for cluster start time (30s)

re-delete file added by rebase

remove assets that are not stored in assets/components/lvms

update assets.yaml

remove unsupported topolvm manifests
@dhellmann
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 7, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 7, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: copejon, dhellmann

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 7, 2023

@copejon: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 0b6dc3d into openshift:main Mar 7, 2023
@copejon copejon deleted the ushift-907 branch April 19, 2023 15:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants