Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bug 1942938: [release-4.7] inspect clusteroperators as a backup to must-gather if it fails #766

Merged
merged 6 commits into from Apr 11, 2021

Conversation

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@ingvagabund: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

[release-4.7] inspect clusteroperators as a backup to must-gather if it fails

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@ingvagabund: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

[release-4.7] inspect clusteroperators as a backup to must-gather if it fails

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

We now gather alerts from the monitoring stack and this takes a long
time run.  Also, when we have problems we normally also have networking
issues so these rarely work when there is something actually broken.
@ingvagabund
Copy link
Member Author

Waiting until #763 gets merged as well. After that getting:

$ ./oc adm must-gather
[must-gather      ] OUT Using must-gather plug-in image: quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:172a9f8aa34966b69dfa485179c6d5109db66d7d7018029dae12ff83c47a2c5d
Gathering data for ns/openshift-config...
Gathering data for ns/openshift-config-managed...
Gathering data for ns/openshift-authentication...
Gathering data for ns/openshift-authentication-operator...
Gathering data for ns/openshift-ingress...
Gathering data for ns/openshift-oauth-apiserver...
Gathering data for ns/openshift-machine-api...
Gathering data for ns/openshift-cloud-credential-operator...
Gathering data for ns/openshift-config-operator...
Gathering data for ns/openshift-console-operator...
Gathering data for ns/openshift-console...
Gathering data for ns/openshift-cluster-storage-operator...
Gathering data for ns/openshift-dns-operator...
Gathering data for ns/openshift-dns...
Gathering data for ns/openshift-etcd-operator...
Gathering data for ns/openshift-etcd...
Gathering data for ns/openshift-image-registry...
Gathering data for ns/openshift-ingress-operator...
Gathering data for ns/openshift-ingress-canary...
Gathering data for ns/openshift-insights...
Gathering data for ns/openshift-kube-apiserver-operator...
Gathering data for ns/openshift-kube-apiserver...
Gathering data for ns/openshift-kube-controller-manager...
Gathering data for ns/openshift-kube-controller-manager-operator...
Gathering data for ns/openshift-kube-scheduler...
Gathering data for ns/openshift-kube-scheduler-operator...
Gathering data for ns/openshift-kube-storage-version-migrator...
Gathering data for ns/openshift-kube-storage-version-migrator-operator...
Gathering data for ns/openshift-cluster-machine-approver...
Gathering data for ns/openshift-machine-config-operator...
Gathering data for ns/openshift-marketplace...
Gathering data for ns/openshift-monitoring...
Gathering data for ns/openshift-user-workload-monitoring...
Gathering data for ns/openshift-multus...
Gathering data for ns/openshift-sdn...
Gathering data for ns/openshift-network-diagnostics...
Gathering data for ns/openshift-network-operator...
Gathering data for ns/openshift-cluster-node-tuning-operator...
Gathering data for ns/openshift-apiserver-operator...
Gathering data for ns/openshift-apiserver...
Gathering data for ns/openshift-controller-manager-operator...
Gathering data for ns/openshift-controller-manager...
Gathering data for ns/openshift-cluster-samples-operator...
Gathering data for ns/openshift...
Gathering data for ns/openshift-operator-lifecycle-manager...
Gathering data for ns/openshift-service-ca-operator...
Gathering data for ns/openshift-service-ca...
Gathering data for ns/openshift-cluster-csi-drivers...
Wrote inspect data to must-gather.local.2241645993367180459.
error running backup collection: errors ocurred while gathering data:
    [skipping gathering secrets/support due to error: secrets "support" not found, skipping gathering EgressFirewall.k8s.ovn.org due to error: the server doesn't have a resource type "EgressFirewall", skipping gathering EgressIP.k8s.ovn.org due to error: the server doesn't have a resource type "EgressIP", skipping gathering endpoints/host-etcd-2 due to error: endpoints "host-etcd-2" not found]error: Failing to test BackupGathering

@ingvagabund
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@ingvagabund ingvagabund changed the title [release-4.7] inspect clusteroperators as a backup to must-gather if it fails bug 1942938: [release-4.7] inspect clusteroperators as a backup to must-gather if it fails Mar 25, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/severity-low Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is low for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Mar 25, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@ingvagabund: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1942938, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1942935 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is MODIFIED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

bug 1942938: [release-4.7] inspect clusteroperators as a backup to must-gather if it fails

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@ingvagabund
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@ingvagabund: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1942938, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1942935 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is MODIFIED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

bug 1942938: [release-4.7] inspect clusteroperators as a backup to must-gather if it fails

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@ingvagabund: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1942938, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1942935 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

bug 1942938: [release-4.7] inspect clusteroperators as a backup to must-gather if it fails

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@ingvagabund: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1942938, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1942935 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

bug 1942938: [release-4.7] inspect clusteroperators as a backup to must-gather if it fails

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Copy link
Member

@soltysh soltysh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Mar 25, 2021
@ingvagabund
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. label Mar 26, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1942938, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1942935 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1942938, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1942935 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1942938, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1942935 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1942938, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1942935 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1942938, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1942935 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1942938, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1942935 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Apr 1, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1942938, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.7.z) matches configured target release for branch (4.7.z)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
  • dependent bug Bugzilla bug 1942935 is in the state VERIFIED, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE))
  • dependent Bugzilla bug 1942935 targets the "4.8.0" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.8.0
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @zhouying7780

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Apr 1, 2021
@zhouying7780
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@zhouying7780
Copy link
Contributor

/label qe-approved

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR label Apr 6, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ingvagabund, soltysh, zhouying7780

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@russellb russellb added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Apr 9, 2021
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 95881af into openshift:release-4.7 Apr 11, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@ingvagabund: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 1942938 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

bug 1942938: [release-4.7] inspect clusteroperators as a backup to must-gather if it fails

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@ingvagabund ingvagabund deleted the backport-749 branch April 12, 2021 06:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

8 participants