New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bug 1995291: Remove docker adjective whenever possible. #767
Conversation
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: rhatdan The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. Mark the issue as fresh by commenting If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /lifecycle stale |
Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity. Mark the issue as fresh by commenting If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /lifecycle rotten |
Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity. Reopen the issue by commenting /close |
@openshift-bot: Closed this PR. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/reopen |
@rhatdan: Reopened this PR. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@adambkaplan @bparees PTAL |
/retest |
|
seems to be missing an import |
dd0a355
to
4e1e01e
Compare
@rhatdan fix the import and i think we can merge this |
/retest |
the pflag import was missing, you appear to have fixed it. should be good to go now. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One nit to switch from aliasing to deprecating the flag and this is good to go. If you want to land it for 4.9 you'll need to open a BZ tracking this one.
No need to container container images "Docker images". Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
@bparees: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1995291, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/bugzilla refresh |
@bparees: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1995291, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@soltysh can you throw an approval on this? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/approve
The main problem with test-cmd is /retest |
@soltysh: Overrode contexts on behalf of soltysh: ci/prow/e2e-agnostic-cmd In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: bparees, rhatdan, soltysh The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/override ci/prow/e2e-agnostic-cmd |
@bparees: Overrode contexts on behalf of bparees: ci/prow/e2e-agnostic-cmd In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-upgrade failure there is also unrelated ([sig-network-edge] Cluster frontend ingress remain available) |
@bparees: Overrode contexts on behalf of bparees: ci/prow/e2e-aws-upgrade In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-builds |
@bparees: Overrode contexts on behalf of bparees: ci/prow/e2e-aws-builds In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/override ci/prow/e2e-agnostic-cmd |
@bparees: Overrode contexts on behalf of bparees: ci/prow/e2e-agnostic-cmd In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/retest-required |
/retest |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
1 similar comment
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
@rhatdan: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Bugzilla bug 1995291 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
No description provided.