Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1995291: Remove docker adjective whenever possible. #767

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Aug 22, 2021

Conversation

rhatdan
Copy link
Contributor

@rhatdan rhatdan commented Mar 17, 2021

No description provided.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: rhatdan
To complete the pull request process, please assign mfojtik after the PR has been reviewed.
You can assign the PR to them by writing /assign @mfojtik in a comment when ready.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jun 15, 2021
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle rotten
/remove-lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Jul 17, 2021
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.

Reopen the issue by commenting /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Exclude this issue from closing again by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

/close

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot closed this Aug 16, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 16, 2021

@openshift-bot: Closed this PR.

In response to this:

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.

Reopen the issue by commenting /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Exclude this issue from closing again by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@rhatdan
Copy link
Contributor Author

rhatdan commented Aug 16, 2021

/reopen

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 16, 2021

@rhatdan: Reopened this PR.

In response to this:

/reopen

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot reopened this Aug 16, 2021
@rhatdan
Copy link
Contributor Author

rhatdan commented Aug 16, 2021

@adambkaplan @bparees PTAL
Is anyone working on this?

@rhatdan
Copy link
Contributor Author

rhatdan commented Aug 16, 2021

/retest

@bparees
Copy link
Contributor

bparees commented Aug 16, 2021

the build bin failed after 1m42s with reason DockerBuildFailed: Dockerfile build strategy has failed.

pkg/cli/newapp/newapp.go:273:31: undefined: newapp.AliasFlags
pkg/cli/newapp/newapp.go:1223:20: undefined: pflag
pkg/cli/newapp/newapp.go:1228:9: undefined: pflag
make: *** [vendor/github.com/openshift/build-machinery-go/make/targets/golang/build.mk:16: build] Error 2
error: build error: error building at STEP "RUN /bin/bash ...ined-variables": error while running runtime: exit status 2

@bparees
Copy link
Contributor

bparees commented Aug 16, 2021

seems to be missing an import

@bparees bparees removed the lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. label Aug 16, 2021
@rhatdan rhatdan force-pushed the docker branch 3 times, most recently from dd0a355 to 4e1e01e Compare August 16, 2021 19:56
@bparees
Copy link
Contributor

bparees commented Aug 16, 2021

@rhatdan fix the import and i think we can merge this

@rhatdan
Copy link
Contributor Author

rhatdan commented Aug 17, 2021

/retest
@bparees Is there still something wrong with the import, not really sure what you mean by this?

@bparees
Copy link
Contributor

bparees commented Aug 17, 2021

the pflag import was missing, you appear to have fixed it. should be good to go now.

Copy link
Member

@soltysh soltysh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One nit to switch from aliasing to deprecating the flag and this is good to go. If you want to land it for 4.9 you'll need to open a BZ tracking this one.

pkg/cli/newapp/newapp.go Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/cli/newbuild/newbuild.go Show resolved Hide resolved
No need to container container images "Docker images".

Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/severity-low Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is low for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/severity-unspecified Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is unspecified for the PR. labels Aug 18, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 18, 2021

@bparees: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1995291, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.9.0" release, but it targets "---" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@bparees
Copy link
Contributor

bparees commented Aug 18, 2021

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Aug 18, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 18, 2021

@bparees: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1995291, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.9.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.9.0)
  • bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @zhouying7780

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Aug 18, 2021
@bparees
Copy link
Contributor

bparees commented Aug 18, 2021

@soltysh can you throw an approval on this?

Copy link
Member

@soltysh soltysh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

@soltysh
Copy link
Member

soltysh commented Aug 19, 2021

The main problem with test-cmd is [sig-arch] events should not repeat pathologically but @deejross is already working on that.
/override ci/prow/e2e-agnostic-cmd

/retest

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 19, 2021

@soltysh: Overrode contexts on behalf of soltysh: ci/prow/e2e-agnostic-cmd

In response to this:

The main problem with test-cmd is [sig-arch] events should not repeat pathologically but @deejross is already working on that.
/override ci/prow/e2e-agnostic-cmd

/retest

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@soltysh
Copy link
Member

soltysh commented Aug 19, 2021

/approve

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 19, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bparees, rhatdan, soltysh

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 19, 2021
@bparees
Copy link
Contributor

bparees commented Aug 19, 2021

/override ci/prow/e2e-agnostic-cmd

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 19, 2021

@bparees: Overrode contexts on behalf of bparees: ci/prow/e2e-agnostic-cmd

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-agnostic-cmd

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@bparees
Copy link
Contributor

bparees commented Aug 19, 2021

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-upgrade

failure there is also unrelated ([sig-network-edge] Cluster frontend ingress remain available)

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 19, 2021

@bparees: Overrode contexts on behalf of bparees: ci/prow/e2e-aws-upgrade

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-upgrade

failure there is also unrelated ([sig-network-edge] Cluster frontend ingress remain available)

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@bparees
Copy link
Contributor

bparees commented Aug 20, 2021

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-builds

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 20, 2021

@bparees: Overrode contexts on behalf of bparees: ci/prow/e2e-aws-builds

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-builds

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@bparees
Copy link
Contributor

bparees commented Aug 20, 2021

/override ci/prow/e2e-agnostic-cmd

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 20, 2021

@bparees: Overrode contexts on behalf of bparees: ci/prow/e2e-agnostic-cmd

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-agnostic-cmd

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@bparees
Copy link
Contributor

bparees commented Aug 20, 2021

/retest-required

@rhatdan
Copy link
Contributor Author

rhatdan commented Aug 21, 2021

/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit d0cb7cc into openshift:master Aug 22, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 22, 2021

@rhatdan: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 1995291 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1995291: Remove docker adjective whenever possible.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-low Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is low for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants