Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PR #2500 Followup #2553

Closed
4 of 5 tasks
kadel opened this issue Jan 31, 2020 · 8 comments · Fixed by #2667
Closed
4 of 5 tasks

PR #2500 Followup #2553

kadel opened this issue Jan 31, 2020 · 8 comments · Fixed by #2667
Assignees
Labels
area/devfile-spec Issues or PRs related to the Devfile specification and how odo handles and interprets it. area/refactoring Issues or PRs related to code refactoring
Projects

Comments

@kadel
Copy link
Member

kadel commented Jan 31, 2020

/assign @kanchwala-yusuf
/kind devfile
/label state/Ready

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

@kadel: The label(s) /label state/Ready cannot be applied. These labels are supported: platform/aws, platform/azure, platform/baremetal, platform/google, platform/libvirt, platform/openstack, ga

In response to this:

/assign @kanchwala-yusuf
/kind devfile
/label state/Ready

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@kadel
Copy link
Member Author

kadel commented Feb 14, 2020

/kind cleanup
/area devfile

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added kind/cleanup area/devfile-spec Issues or PRs related to the Devfile specification and how odo handles and interprets it. labels Feb 14, 2020
@kadel
Copy link
Member Author

kadel commented Feb 14, 2020

/triage ready

@kadel kadel added this to For consideration in Sprint 180 via automation Feb 14, 2020
@girishramnani girishramnani moved this from For consideration to To do in Sprint 180 Feb 18, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

@kadel: The label(s) `/label state/Ready

cannot be applied. These labels are supported:platform/aws, platform/azure, platform/baremetal, platform/google, platform/libvirt, platform/openstack, ga, tide/merge-method-merge, tide/merge-method-rebase, tide/merge-method-squash`

In response to this:

/assign @kanchwala-yusuf
/kind devfile
/label state/Ready

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@girishramnani girishramnani added estimated-size/S (5-10) Rough sizing for Epics. Less then one sprint of work for one person points/3 and removed estimated-size/S (5-10) Rough sizing for Epics. Less then one sprint of work for one person labels Feb 19, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

@kadel: The label(s) `/label state/Ready

cannot be applied. These labels are supported:platform/aws, platform/azure, platform/baremetal, platform/google, platform/libvirt, platform/openstack, ga, tide/merge-method-merge, tide/merge-method-rebase, tide/merge-method-squash`

In response to this:

/assign @kanchwala-yusuf
/kind devfile
/label state/Ready

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

@kadel: The label(s) `/label state/Ready

cannot be applied. These labels are supported:platform/aws, platform/azure, platform/baremetal, platform/google, platform/libvirt, platform/openstack, ga, tide/merge-method-merge, tide/merge-method-rebase, tide/merge-method-squash`

In response to this:

/assign @kanchwala-yusuf
/kind devfile
/label state/Ready

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

@kadel: The label(s) `/label state/Ready

cannot be applied. These labels are supported:platform/aws, platform/azure, platform/baremetal, platform/google, platform/libvirt, platform/openstack, ga, tide/merge-method-merge, tide/merge-method-rebase, tide/merge-method-squash`

In response to this:

/assign @kanchwala-yusuf
/kind devfile
/label state/Ready

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

@kadel: The label(s) `/label state/Ready

cannot be applied. These labels are supported:platform/aws, platform/azure, platform/baremetal, platform/google, platform/libvirt, platform/openstack, ga, tide/merge-method-merge, tide/merge-method-rebase, tide/merge-method-squash`

In response to this:

/assign @kanchwala-yusuf
/kind devfile
/label state/Ready

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@kanchwala-yusuf kanchwala-yusuf moved this from To do to For review in Sprint 180 Mar 9, 2020
@girishramnani girishramnani added this to For consideration in Sprint 181 via automation Mar 11, 2020
@girishramnani girishramnani removed this from For review in Sprint 180 Mar 11, 2020
@girishramnani girishramnani moved this from For consideration to For review in Sprint 181 Mar 11, 2020
Sprint 181 automation moved this from For review to Done Mar 16, 2020
@rm3l rm3l added the area/refactoring Issues or PRs related to code refactoring label Jun 16, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/devfile-spec Issues or PRs related to the Devfile specification and how odo handles and interprets it. area/refactoring Issues or PRs related to code refactoring
Projects
Archived in project
Sprint 181
  
Done
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants